Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:50:19 +0100
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 22:40 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
Ah, yes. Could exceeding size have produced the -1 ins.
-1(%ebp,%eax), %eax
too? It is
-10002(%ebp,%eax), %eax
for the "normal size" array of 10_000 elements?
.
- References:
- Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: ME
- Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: Adam Beneschan
- Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- Prev by Date: Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- Next by Date: Re: Real Time IO routines answering Simon Wright part 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- Next by thread: Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?
- Index(es):
