Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?

I have seen the "new" Ada referred to as both Ada 2005 and Ada 2007.
When referring to the new standard and without referring to any
particular implementation of it, which is correct or preferred? I sort
of understand that the standard wasn't agreed to until 2007 but that
might not be the defining event. Is there an official designation or
are left to our own devices to call it what we want?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Generic package parameters not externally visible : whats the rational ?
    ... Maybe Randy was referring to My Fair Lady? ... (The next Ada ... Europe conference is taking place in València in Spain, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: CDT-5
    ... I am very much in favor of the ADA ... creating the code standard. ... then pay again to have them in my software. ... > government where you want to go, they will simply steamroller over you. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Ada Component Registry proposal
    ... ;-) But the current standard really is Ada 2000, ... see what changed between Ada 95 and Ada 2000, but I prefer to just use ... "When ISO published the Technical Corrigendum, ... the project editor would provide to ISO in response to such a request. ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: CDT-5
    ... Anyone beside me annoyed that the ADA uses our dues money to>>> develop ... >>> this standard, but charges us to obtain a copy of the standard once ... >>> Am I alone in expecting the ADA to send dues paying members a copy of>>> the ... >>> Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.>>> Troy, Michigan, USA ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: shame on MISRA
    ... and that full Ada is not nearly as bad as full C. ... the price of the MISRA C standard is infinitely ... The MISRA C standard may cost money for a valid reason. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)