Re: Largest size array in Gnat 2005 for the PC?

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:53 -0500, tmoran@xxxxxxx wrote:
too big to fit into a 32-bit register, so apparently the compiler is
truncating to 0 before setting EAX.
Do you get the same result when you compile in Ada mode, ie, with
the -gnato option?

Yes, same results. Using -fstack-check adds a warning that the frame
size is too large, the debugging switch -gnatdF yields a compilation
error saying that the subtype of a is too large... (Which it is,
obviously).


.