Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Officially informally (!), it is "Ada 2005" because ARM 3.1/2 says so.
That is the result of a majority agreement between the members of the
working group, most of whom are compiler vendors.

Just being pedantic, I don't see that statement in ARM 3.1/2; that
paragraph doesn't exist; see
http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-3-1.html

Perhaps you meant a different paragraph?

Yes, I meant paragraph 3.1/2 in the Introduction, not paragraph 2 in
section 3.1. See http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-0-3.html

--
Ludovic Brenta.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: About your example...
    ... > Figure out how you are going to change copy members or database includes. ... of the code that my tools will have to handle may contain the EXIT PARAGRAPH ... and some of the code that my tools output may contain the EXIT ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
    ... working group, most of whom are compiler vendors. ... Perhaps you meant a different paragraph? ... I think the canonical reference to this paragraph is ARM 0. ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
    ... working group, most of whom are compiler vendors. ... I thought paragraph numbers are not supposed to have decimal ... between paragraphs of the original Ada 95 standard, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Nested class doesnt obey member access rules
    ... The members of a nested class have no special access to members ... whereby this paragraph is replaced with ... Many compilers are tracking this DR. VC does since at least ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)