Re: ada compiler?
- From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:24:23 +0100
Jeffrey R. Carter writes:
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
Wouldn't this be even more evidence in favor of having
-gnato -fstack-check on by default? If someone begins
learning Ada and then notices that the promised overflow
checking doesn't take place, what will be the reaction?
There have been a number of threads here dealing with just that:
people asking why GNAT didn't give the expected behavior, generally
because they didn't compile with -gnato.
I'm starting to consider such a change for Debian gnat. Overflow
checks can be disabled explicitly with -gnatp or pragma Suppress.
However, some programs don't compile with -fstack-check because some
stack frames are "too big" (whatever that means). Thoughts?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: ada compiler?
- References:
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: anon
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: tmoran
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: anon
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: anon
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: ada compiler?
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: ada compiler?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ranting] Take Command Plugin, Win32Ada and Ada.Directories
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for topics in an Ada course?
- Previous by thread: Re: ada compiler?
- Next by thread: Re: ada compiler?
- Index(es):