Re: ANN: GNAT/GPL Solaris 10: 2007-solaris-x86

Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Super - but just a nitpick: We have the architecture as part of the
package name and not as part of the version. The reason is that on
"Browse all Files" [1] only the newest release is opened and only
the last 3 releases are shown at all.

OK - but I don't see this policy defined anywhare? and I don't
understand the R6, R7, R8 tags?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: packages revisited
    ... you want to add to the general CL reader. ... I see no reason for not doing that. ... it in every package we are "in". ... If there is no such symbol, it is interned to:a-package ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Shipping in eBay
    ... >>> a good reason to not do so. ... >>> away from my job, kids, wife, etc. to mail this package to another ... No access to USPS? ... transaction online and the postman will pick up your package at your ...
    (rec.models.scale)
  • Re: packages, load paths and environment variables
    ... There is one reason. ... you only need the package definition of the first (you only ... Therefore when you have CL sources with crossed dependencies, ... and add a in the sources (implementation module) of A. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: OCD programmers and backwards compatibility :-).
    ... upgrading rpms forever with individual packages being released, ... I can tell the only reason was a bunch of OCD programmers who broke ... stop checking in non-backward compatible changes without fantastically ... the foobar package play nice with the rest of the release. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Finding installed package files
    ... >>Well I really dislike that the Fedora guys renamed the package. ... the rename is done for a very good reason - changes that make it ... the reason I wanted to replace it was ... the Linux side of my box after using OOo for over a year with XP. ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)