comp.lang.ada
- Job Opening
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Sequential_Io metadata
- Re: Array Syntax
- Re: Array Syntax
- Re: Array Syntax
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: bug report being ignored
- Sequential_Io metadata
- Re: bug report being ignored
- Re: Array Syntax
- Array Syntax
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: KC normalization form for text
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: KC normalization form for text
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: bug report being ignored
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- KC normalization form for text
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: bug report being ignored
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- bug report being ignored
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Interfacing to C: big structures
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Learning tagged types
- Re: Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Questions on using prgma Import (C, foo)
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Google Summer of Code 2008 and Ada
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- GtkAda Font scaling possible?
- From: jason.height@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- From: framefritti@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- [Reminder] Public Ada Courses 3-7 March '08 in Carlsbad CA
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Free database bindings for Windows?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Learning tagged types
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Learning tagged types
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Separate Compilation in Programming Languages
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- hardware architectures to run Ada on in 2008
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Generic Zero Length Array
- Generic Zero Length Array
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Access type (mis)use (Was: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?)
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Access type (mis)use (Was: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?)
- Re: Access type (mis)use (Was: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?)
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- From: marcelo.batera@xxxxxxxxx
- Access type (mis)use (Was: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?)
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Subject: POSIX , Ada, Line Feeds, etc
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Free Ada83 compiler for older Solaris/SPARC or IRIX?
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- From: Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Sharing tips for GNAT project files
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: Free database bindings for Windows?
- Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Subject: POSIX , Ada, Line Feeds, etc (was Automated conversion to C++)
- Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- From: marcelo.batera@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- Re: GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- From: marcelo.batera@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Free database bindings for Windows?
- Re: Free database bindings for Windows?
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Free database bindings for Windows?
- From: marcelo.batera@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Free database bindings for Windows?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- GNAT Project Manager and DLLs
- From: marcelo.batera@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- From: alexandru.chircu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: Online Ada Tutorials
- From: framefritti@xxxxxxxxx
- Online Ada Tutorials
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- undefined reference to `adainit'
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Re: Automated conversion to C++?
- Automated conversion to C++?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
- Re: Start_Process_Search error detection
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Start_Process_Search error detection
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Start_Process_Search error detection
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT
- Re: Newbie's question
- From: Christos Chryssochoidis
- Start_Process_Search error detection
- Re: Newbie's question
- From: Christos Chryssochoidis
- Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?
- Announce: QtAda 1.0.2
- Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?
- Updated versions of AdaSubst and AdaDep
- Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?
- Re: Newbie's question
- Re: Newbie's question [SOLVED]
- From: Christos Chryssochoidis
- Newbie's question
- From: Christos Chryssochoidis
- ANN: GtkAda contributions 2.1
- ANN: Simple components v2.7
- Re: Loosing tagged type via linked list
- Re: Another question about controlled types.
- Re: Another question about controlled types.
- Another question about controlled types.
- Re: Loosing tagged type via linked list
- Re: Loosing tagged type via linked list
- Re: Loosing tagged type via linked list
- Loosing tagged type via linked list
- From: jason.height@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Small glitch with AdaControl fixed
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: ada-AutoIT 1.5.3 Released
- Re: ada-AutoIT 1.5.3 Released
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Re: ada-AutoIT 1.5.3 Released
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- From: framefritti@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Re: Curiosity about rage checking
- Curiosity about rage checking
- From: framefritti@xxxxxxxxx
- ada-AutoIT 1.5.3 Released
- Re: Question about controlled types.
- Question about controlled types.
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- AdaControl 1.8r7 released
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Re: Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Slightly OT: Linux distributions and Ada
- Ada in Debian: transition to GCC 4.3 for Lenny
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- Re: Using a generic instance to implement a public subprogram?
- Re: Ada Thread Termination
- Re: Ada Thread Termination
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- ANN: TclAdaShell release
- Re: Using a generic instance to implement a public subprogram?
- Re: Using a generic instance to implement a public subprogram?
- Re: Using a generic instance to implement a public subprogram?
- Using a generic instance to implement a public subprogram?
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- Re: ANN: GNAT/GPL Solaris 10: 2007-solaris-x86
- Re: [anouncement] MingGW release for the GNU Ada Project
- Re: Ada Thread Termination
- Re: access assignation. Aliasing problems?
- Re: Ada Thread Termination
- Ada Thread Termination
- Re: access assignation. Aliasing problems?
- Re: Problem with Jewl on GPS and AdaGide
- Re: Problem with Jewl on GPS and AdaGide
- Re: access assignation. Aliasing problems?
- Re: access assignation. Aliasing problems?
- Re: declaration of an incomplete private type before the private part
- access assignation. Aliasing problems?
- Re: declaration of an incomplete private type before the private part
- Re: declaration of an incomplete private type before the private part
- declaration of an incomplete private type before the private part
- Re: Problem with Jewl on GPS and AdaGide
- Re: Problem with Jewl on GPS and AdaGide
