Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado.alves@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Upon failing miserably to convince GNAT to use a stack of 200M, I am
currently working around the problem by writing my own matrix-by-
vector multiplication function. It takes 2 seconds for a 5000 x 5000
matrix, but it does not explode.
I continue interested in ways to augment the stack size (or another
way) to enable use of the standard library. Not so much for speed, but
more for validation (GNAT passes ACATS right? Are ACATS for this
library setup yet?)
Thanks a lot.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: johnscpg
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Randy Brukardt
- Re: Larger matrices
- References:
- Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Larger matrices
- Prev by Date: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Next by Date: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Previous by thread: Re: Larger matrices
- Next by thread: Re: Larger matrices
- Index(es):