Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado.alves@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Ago, 18:19, amado.al...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
index : anIndex;
buffer : aBuffer;
This is backwards to me:
anIndex : Index;
aBuffer : Buffer;
E.g. the value is a specific instance vs the type is general. The names should
reflect that.
IIRC the rationale for "index : anIndex" is that it sounds like
English "index is an Index". Natural language syntax is a bitch!
.
- References:
- Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Steve
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Ray Blaak
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado . alves
- Suffix _T for types found good
- Prev by Date: Re: Is GNU Ada active?
- Next by Date: Re: Larger matrices
- Previous by thread: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Next by thread: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Index(es):