Re: Larger matrices
- From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:13:40 GMT
amado.alves@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
And Ada got in the way: slicing restricted to one-dimensional arrays!
Compared to other languages that have no slicing at all?
--
Jeff Carter
"To Err is human, to really screw up, you need C++!"
Stéphane Richard
63
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- References:
- Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Larger matrices
- From: amado . alves
- Larger matrices
- Prev by Date: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Next by Date: Re: Is GNU Ada active?
- Previous by thread: Re: Larger matrices
- Next by thread: Re: Larger matrices
- Index(es):