Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:27:41 GMT
Steve wrote:
Funny, with my simple example of anIndex you comment that anIndex is meaningless and go on to use Index_Value as being more informative. Your example is to simple and worthless as well. All variables contain values.
I'm glad to hear that you think "Index is an index" is more meaningful than "Start position is an index value".
--
Jeff Carter
"We call your door-opening request a silly thing."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
17
.
- References:
- Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Steve
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Ray Blaak
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: amado . alves
- Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- From: Steve
- Suffix _T for types found good
- Prev by Date: Re: simple programs -> one file with gps 2008 (gpl)?
- Next by Date: [Solved] Re: simple programs -> one file with gps 2008 (gpl)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Next by thread: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
