Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:29:51 +0300
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Speaking of lexical analysis and recursive descent parsers, I'd like
to know whether anyone here has tried OpenToken[1] and would like to
comment on it.
[1] http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/OpenToken/OpenToken.html
I use its lexical-analysis functions a lot, for many different purposes. It works quite well enough for me. However, I can generally myself design the language to be analysed. I would not be surprised to find some awkward problems with languages that have been defined by others -- but that probably holds for any general lexical-scanner tool.
I very much like the absence of any "generator" step -- a simple "gnatmake" is enough to update the application after a change to the token structure.
I have not used the parsing functions in OpenToken; they did not exist when I started to use OpenToken, so I got into the habit of writing my parsers manually.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- References:
- Status of ayacc and aflex?
- From: Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Status of ayacc and aflex?
- Prev by Date: Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- Next by Date: Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- Previous by thread: Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- Next by thread: Re: Status of ayacc and aflex?
- Index(es):