Re: Common exception handling
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:16:40 +0200
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:22:03 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak wrote:
On 26 Sie, 21:14, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I wished to have ranges of exceptions
Hierarchies, not ranges.
Yes, but it is still a range, technically, a bounded set. The problem is
that this set can be infinite. Such structure of an ordered set have real
numbers, strings, and, of course, type hierarchies.
The difference is that entities in the hierarchy can be not only
extended but also specialized and that would nicely fit in the OO part
of the language.
Extension = specialization in classic OO (and Ada). When a type is extended
by adding new members and/or methods it is a specialization of the class
rooted in the derivation base.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- References:
- Common exception handling
- From: shaunpatterson
- Re: Common exception handling
- From: shaunpatterson
- Re: Common exception handling
- From: Adam Beneschan
- Re: Common exception handling
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Common exception handling
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Common exception handling
- Prev by Date: Re: Common exception handling
- Next by Date: Re: Common exception handling
- Previous by thread: Re: Common exception handling
- Next by thread: Re: Common exception handling
- Index(es):