Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:17:20 +0200
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:41:02 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote:
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Under the assumption of directories known to the application, there is no
need to search them. Typically an application either maintains its files
and so "knows" them up to the Exits test, or it knows nothing.
Nonsense.
I have an application that builds mp3 playlists. I specify the
root directory of the mp3 file tree on the command line, the Ada code
searches within that directory for mp3 files to add to a playlist.
I said "typically". A command-line application for maintenance of
playlists, which does not support file browsing by is by no means typical.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: Randy Brukardt
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: Stephen Leake
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Next by Date: Re: Ada Shootout program for K-Nucleotide (patches)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Next by thread: Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|