Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: tmoran@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:49:10 +0000 (UTC)
I have an application that builds mp3 playlists. I specify the
root directory of the mp3 file tree on the command line, the Ada code
searches within that directory for mp3 files to add to a playlist.
I said "typically". A command-line application for maintenance of
playlists, which does not support file browsing by is by no means typical.
"Unusual" for one person is "typical" for another.
I have an Ada system that runs a TV station. There are lots of places
where the user uses a GUI to indicate a show, and the program needs to
scan a directory to find its episodes, or he indicates a show episode
and the system needs to build a playlist by scanning a directory to find
the video files, or the user loads a DVD and the system needs to scan
its directory to find the video files. The user sees "show", "episode",
"DVD" as his abstractions - he doesn't see directories or files.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- References:
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: Variant record assignment fails discriminant check
- Next by Date: Gem 39 - compiler specific?
- Previous by thread: Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Next by thread: Re: Interpretation of extensions different from Unix/Linux?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|