Re: Review of Art of Assembly Language
From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Previous message: The Half A Wannabee: "Re: HLA suggestions"
- In reply to:(deleted message) pH: "Re: Review of Art of Assembly Language"
- Next in thread: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Reply: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 08:59:06 GMT
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 02:44:31 -0500, pH <high@cidity.level> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 04:29:22 GMT, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:50:18 -0500, pH <high@cidity.level> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:59:27 GMT, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You ever wonder, particularly when you've *just* arrived, if an "attack"
>>> is actually a defense?
>>>
>>
>>That was a nasty bit of work, and I am sick of garbage like that.
>
> Yeah. So are they.
>
>>If I see the same behavior on the part of the other party, they go down
>>too.
>>
>>Fair enough?
>
> Hey, dude... it's your newsreader.
>
> Jeff
>
> http://www.jefftturner.com
>
>
That's true. I run Linux. If you run Windows *they* own your newsreader.
:-)
--
Alan C this post ends with w
q
- Next message: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Previous message: The Half A Wannabee: "Re: HLA suggestions"
- In reply to:(deleted message) pH: "Re: Review of Art of Assembly Language"
- Next in thread: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Reply: Richard Pavlicek: "ASM shell for Windows programs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|