Re: Assembler Benchmarks

From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 01/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:03:17 -0000

Betov wrote:
> Beth wrote:
> > it would be unfair and misleading
> > to suggest a link when you're refusing to talk to "LuxAsm"
developers
>
> "refusing"... Not exactly.
>
> 1) No time (All the main implementations in RosAsm
> must absolutely be done before one year or so...).
>
> 2) I do not "believe" in the Project. ;)
>
> 3) I think now, that Linux has a very small future.
>
> Other than that, i have nothing, at all, _against_,
> even if much different from RosAsm or from "Betov
> philosophia". Who cares? Doesn't "Specific" also
> mean perfectely adapted to a problem, instead of
> perfectly following some "model"? :))

Indeed; And, thank you, because if Frank and Yeoh are reading this,
then I was actually, therefore, somewhat correct in the interpretation
of what Rene means by "specific" in my post on the mailing list...but,
then, I've listened to him explain over and over for years that, like,
_something_ had to stick eventually ;)

Granted, not "refuse" then...but it still amounts to the same thing in
practice...

Beth :)

Quantcast