Re: Assembler Benchmarks
From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Next message: Jumbo: "Re: NASM tutorial"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- In reply to: hutch--: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Gerhard W. Gruber: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:16:23 -0000
hutch-- wrote:
> This actually sounds like a great idea, a decent high tech linux
> assembler with some real grunt and engineered properly from the
> beginning so its fully extendable. Problem is its hard to get work
out
> of me when I have a lot to do with the MASM32 project and a lot of
> other stuff. The other problem is I am maninly set up for Windows
> coding so I don't have the toys and tools for working in linux.
Understood; I'm actually have distinct problems getting Red Hat onto
my second machine here...which is actually rather bizarre because Red
Hat 8 was on the machine, I tried "upgrading" to RH9 and it keeps
crashing...so I tried going back to the RH8 discs and now even those
don't work...Win98 goes onto the machine okay but does start to do
straight things with the hard disks after a while...clearly, something
is wrong with the way the hardware has been wired up (which I did
myself so it's possible I've done something stupid...I just can't work
out what it could have been...the hard drive jumpers _are_ correct, I
checked them up on a website)...
> I will have a spare box shortly which I will try and install
Slackware
> on as the Redhat I tried last time was a buggy bad bannered pig that
> could not build its own kernel.
>
> Regards and good luck with the project.
Thanks...
Beth :)
- Next message: Jumbo: "Re: NASM tutorial"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- In reply to: hutch--: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Gerhard W. Gruber: "Re: Assembler Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]