Re: The Lib debate
From: Octavio (933191278_at_terra.es)
Date: 02/08/04
- Next message: August Derleth: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm"
- In reply to: Betov: "The Lib debate"
- Next in thread: Betov: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Reply: Betov: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Feb 2004 01:18:49 -0800
Betov <betov@free.fr> wrote in message news:<XnF948887387D7A0betovfreefr@212.27.42.66>...
> As JohnFound says, "using only source-level libraries" is the
> evident way to go for Assembly. This is the way i went for RosAsm
The inconvenience is that source-level libraries must be writen in the
same language, so you canīt use a Fasm library in Rosasm, while binary
libraries are more portables.
- Next message: August Derleth: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm"
- In reply to: Betov: "The Lib debate"
- Next in thread: Betov: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Reply: Betov: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|