Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware
From: hutch-- (hutch_at_movsd.com)
Date: 02/10/04
- Next message: hutch--: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Previous message: hutch--: "Re: The Lib debate"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware"
- Next in thread: Annie: "Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Feb 2004 14:53:52 -0800
========================================
To Beth:
No line to be drawn in the sand, here?
No problem?
========================================
No, there is no line in the sand, such a statement assumes that there
is a competition and whether the illustrious highly self acclaimed
author of BetovAsm knows it or not, he is just a free kick for
endlessly shooting his mouth off and repeatedly getting caught at it.
For a person who will not negotiate or behave himself and who
continues to criticise other people and their work, all there is left
to do is keep up his destruction until he shuts up.
Betov has the choice of shutting his mouth or being further damaged
every time he opens it.
The bottom line is very few are interested in forum after forum being
turned into Betov's "sh*t pit" when his work is so insignificant that
very few actually bother to use it.
The vast majority of assembler programmers are using MASM because it
is powerful enough to do the job for them and they simply don't care
what Betov's problems are or what his crackpot political theory
requires.
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
- Next message: hutch--: "Re: The Lib debate"
- Previous message: hutch--: "Re: The Lib debate"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware"
- Next in thread: Annie: "Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
