alt.lang.asm
By Author

1337 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

Starting: 01/31/04
Ending: 02/29/04

Al
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
Alex McDonald
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/29/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/27/04)
- Re: Some of the US software patents (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/25/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: Portable assembler 4 microcontrollers. (02/21/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/19/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/19/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
Andrew Kennedy
- Counterfeit chip ? (02/27/04)
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/24/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/23/04)
- Proposal (02/23/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/23/04)
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/22/04)
- Not your usual DOS program (02/22/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/19/04)
- Re: cshred fixed (02/19/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting Part FFFFFFFFFFFFh (02/17/04)
- Re: cshred fixed (02/19/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Timing routine not working (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting Part FFFFFFFFFFFFh (02/17/04)
- Starting with Win 32 (02/17/04)
- Other asm resources (02/16/04)
- Re: cshred fixed (02/16/04)
- Date Time Stamper (02/16/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- cshred fixed (02/13/04)
- Re: Zero out memory in a com file, humor (02/13/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Zero out memory in a com file, humor (02/12/04)
- Re: shr for division not quite working (02/10/04)
- shr for division not quite working (02/10/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/09/04)
- Check if new file is present (02/04/04)
andrewkennedy1_at_ev1.net
- Setting some priorities (02/06/04)
- Show some unprintable chars DOS code Win 98 (02/06/04)
- Re: Blue flame not showing (02/06/04)
- Blue flame not showing (02/06/04)
- Re: Shred.asm Ver 1g (02/04/04)
- Shred.asm Ver 1g (02/04/04)
- Re: Calculate string count at runtime (02/03/04)
- Calculate string count at runtime (02/02/04)
- Re: String changer early attempt (02/01/04)
Annie
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/29/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/24/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/15/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/15/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/11/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/08/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/07/04)
- HLA/RosAsm Wars (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/06/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/06/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/02/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/02/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/02/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
arargh402NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/29/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/21/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/21/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/15/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/06/04)
Arislan
- Re: Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
- Re: Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
- Re: Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
- Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
August Derleth
- Re: Editors (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Programming (02/06/04)
- Re: Shred.asm Ver 1g (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
Auric__
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
Ben Yates
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
Beth
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: Editors (02/29/04)
- Re: Editors (02/29/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmark Generator Program (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/28/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/28/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/28/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/28/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/28/04)
- Re: Editors (02/28/04)
- Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Editors (02/26/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/26/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/26/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/26/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/26/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/26/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/26/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/25/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/25/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/25/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/24/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: Editors (02/24/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/24/04)
- Re: Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/24/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/24/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/22/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/22/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/22/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/22/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/21/04)
- Re: WASM available on Webster (02/21/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/20/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/20/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/20/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/20/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/20/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/20/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/20/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/20/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/19/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/19/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/19/04)
- Re: cshred fixed (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/18/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/18/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/16/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/16/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/16/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/13/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/11/04)
- Re: Q [x86] INT in protected mode? (02/11/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/04/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/03/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/02/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/02/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/02/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/02/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: LuxAsm Development Team (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: Rocket Science (02/01/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
Betov
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/26/04)
- Re: Editors (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/24/04)
- Re: Editors (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/21/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/18/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/19/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/19/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/18/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/18/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/17/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/15/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/11/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/10/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/10/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- The Lib debate (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: MS Visual Studio: some kind of "...A Linux Dev environement?" (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: MS Visual Studio: some kind of "...A Linux Dev environement?" (02/06/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#4) (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/03/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/03/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/02/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/01/04)
- To Frank (01/31/04)
Beyond2000!
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/06/04)
Bill Marcum
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/24/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/02/04)
Bo Persson
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
Bob Masta
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/17/04)
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/17/04)
Brian Webb
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/25/04)
Bx.C
- Re: Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
- Re: Access violation on a WindowsXP gameserver program (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/29/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/27/04)
- 3 questions... optimization suggestions... and alignment check flag... (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/24/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/24/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/23/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- multiple prefixes from same group... (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/17/04)
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/17/04)
- Re: Zero out memory in a com file, humor (02/12/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/06/04)
C
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/29/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/17/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
Chewy509
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
Childers
- Re: Is the HLA group closed to almost everyone? (02/04/04)
- Re: Is the HLA group closed to almost everyone? (02/03/04)
Christian Wallukat
- Re: Strings in asm (02/25/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/24/04)
- Strings in asm (02/24/04)
da_buddha
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/18/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/15/04)
donkey
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/28/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/27/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
dude
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
Dunny
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
Ed Beroset
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM for Pocket PC? (02/14/04)
- tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/13/04)
Eric
- Re: Portable assembler 4 microcontrollers. (02/23/04)
Evenbit
- Re: Tru Calling (02/27/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/27/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/27/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/27/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/25/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/25/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/23/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/23/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/23/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/23/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/23/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/23/04)
- Re: Clearing data available bit in LSR? (02/23/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/22/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/21/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/21/04)
- Re: Portable assembler 4 microcontrollers. (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: ASM for Pocket PC? (02/17/04)
Frank Kotler
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/27/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/24/04)
- Re: VBE in W2000 (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/23/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/22/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: WASM available on Webster (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/18/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/17/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome code (02/13/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: shr for division not quite working (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Check if new file is present (02/04/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: Calculate string count at runtime (02/02/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/02/04)
- Re: const section (02/01/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: Rocket Science (02/01/04)
Geoff
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/29/04)
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/29/04)
Gerhard W. Gruber
- Re: Some of the US software patents (02/28/04)
- Re: Some of the US software patents (02/27/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/27/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/27/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/25/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/25/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/24/04)
- Softwarepatents in the EU (02/24/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/18/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: MS Visual Studio: some kind of "...A Linux Dev environement?" (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: MS Visual Studio: some kind of "...A Linux Dev environement?" (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/03/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/03/04)
- Re: test (02/01/04)
- Re: testing (02/01/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Editors (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/26/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/23/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/21/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/21/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/17/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/08/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: const section (02/01/04)
- Re: String changer early attempt (02/01/04)
Herman Dullink
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
hutch--
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/27/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/21/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/20/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/20/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/16/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- Re: Anti-American... WTF!?! (02/13/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/12/04)
- A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/12/04)
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/11/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/10/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/10/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/10/04)
- Re: First RosAsm -app- (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Hey Betov, come clean :) (02/09/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#4) (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/07/04)
- Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/06/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/06/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/04/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/03/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/03/04)
- Re: LuxAsm Development Team (02/02/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/01/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/01/04)
J. Yazel
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/10/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/09/04)
jam man
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/26/04)
James Van Buskirk
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/16/04)
Jason Eberly
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
Jean-Christophe Boisserie
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
JG
- Programming (02/05/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/03/04)
- What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/02/04)
JGCasey
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/06/04)
- Re: Programming (02/06/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/04/04)
john chung
- Re: Development tools...... (02/22/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/13/04)
- Development tools...... (02/12/04)
- testing (02/02/04)
- Re: New Benchmark Generator Code Available (02/01/04)
- testing (02/01/04)
- test (02/01/04)
- Re: New Benchmark Generator Code Available (02/01/04)
John Dahlman
- A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#4) (02/05/04)
- A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#3) (02/05/04)
- A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/05/04)
- A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/05/04)
John H. Lindsay
- Re: HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/09/04)
JohnFound
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/15/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/13/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
Jumbo
- Re: const section (02/02/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
- Re: const section (02/01/04)
- Re: const section (02/01/04)
Kain
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/22/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/22/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/22/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/21/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/21/04)
- Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/20/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
KTC
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
Kurt Weber
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/24/04)
luvr
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/19/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/18/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/15/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: Programming (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#4) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/05/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/05/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/04/04)
- OOP Style vs. OOP Programming Language (02/04/04)
Manish Singh
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/04/04)
Matt Taylor
- Re: Caching data (02/13/04)
- Re: Caching data (02/12/04)
Michael
- MASM and MS-Link (02/29/04)
Michaelo
- Portable assembler 4 microcontrollers. (02/20/04)
Nathan C. Baker
- OT: Tru Calling (02/19/04)
- Re: Starting with Win 32 (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Beginners Crash course in assembly level 4 (02/19/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/19/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/19/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/17/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/17/04)
- Re: int_ (02/16/04)
- Re: ASM for Pocket PC? (02/14/04)
- ASM for Pocket PC? (02/13/04)
- Pocket PC Apps in ASM? (02/13/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- The ROSASM Achilles' heel (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
Octavio
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: New Benchmark Generator Code Available (02/01/04)
Odyssey
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/03/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
Pascal
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
Peter
- Re: very accurate clock (02/06/04)
- very accurate clock (02/05/04)
pgx_at_pgrahams.com
- Re: Even brute force was better then Delphi ! (02/25/04)
Phil Carmody
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/24/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/24/04)
- Re: SSE2 int/fp query - MOVHPD (02/23/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/22/04)
- SSE2 int/fp query - MOVHPD (02/21/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/18/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/18/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Do they all understand English? (was: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?)) (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/12/04)
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/11/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/10/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Are all bits of the P4 OOO? (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/09/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/06/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/05/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
pinibz
- Looking for Zilog ZDUMP utility (02/04/04)
PlasmaDragon
- Re: Proposal (02/26/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: Caching data (02/13/04)
- Re: Caching data (02/12/04)
- Caching data (02/11/04)
qual1
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: Low(er) level assembly with Hyde's AoA and HLA (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/18/04)
- Rene's Manifesto (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/03/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/03/04)
- Re: Thinking assembly? (02/03/04)
R.Wieser
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: Show some unprintable chars DOS code Win 98 (02/06/04)
- Re: Blue flame not showing (02/06/04)
- Re: Check if new file is present (02/06/04)
- Re: Blue flame not showing (02/06/04)
- Re: Calculate string value at runtime (02/04/04)
- Re: Check if new file is present (02/04/04)
- Re: Calculate string value at runtime (02/03/04)
- Re: Calculate string value (02/03/04)
- Re: Calculate string value at runtime (02/03/04)
Ragnar Seton
- Re: Clearing data available bit in LSR? (02/24/04)
- Clearing data available bit in LSR? (02/23/04)
Rally
- Re: ASM for Pocket PC? (02/16/04)
Randall Hyde
- Re: Assembler Benchmark Generator Program (02/29/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmark Generator Program (02/29/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/29/04)
- Re: Strings in asm (02/28/04)
- Re: Editors (02/28/04)
- Assembler Benchmark Generator Program (02/27/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/27/04)
- Re: Even brute force was better then Delphi ! (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/25/04)
- Re: Editors (02/24/04)
- Re: Editors (02/24/04)
- Re: Canonical format (was Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?)) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/21/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/21/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/21/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/21/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/21/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (was... who cares?) (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- WASM available on Webster (02/19/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/16/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/15/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Canonical format for header files (02/15/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/14/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/14/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/12/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- HLA v1.61 is now Available (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/09/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#4) (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/06/04)
- Webster Update (02/05/04)
- Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/05/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/05/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: Is the HLA group closed to almost everyone? (02/04/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Webster Reorganization (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
- Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
- Re: LuxAsm Development Team (02/01/04)
- Re: New Benchmark Generator Code Available (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (02/01/04)
- Re: New Benchmark Generator Code Available (02/01/04)
- Re: Assembler Benchmarks (01/31/04)
Robert Craven
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/12/04)
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/11/04)
- MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/11/04)
Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Tru Calling (02/26/04)
- Re: Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/20/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/05/04)
- Re: Shred.asm Ver 1g (02/05/04)
- Re: Shred.asm Ver 1g (02/04/04)
- Re: Count-down to 4,000,000 (02/02/04)
Robert Weemeyer
- Do they all understand English? (was: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?)) (02/14/04)
Rodneidy
- Classes types (02/07/04)
RoWsRaIrTiEo
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/29/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/27/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/26/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/26/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/26/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/23/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/22/04)
- language (02/21/04)
- I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/21/04)
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/16/04)
- Re: int_ (02/16/04)
- Re: input & output in assembly (02/16/04)
- int_ (02/16/04)
- Re: cshred fixed (02/16/04)
- Re: BootStrap & newbie questions (02/14/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: shr for division not quite working (02/13/04)
Roy Jones
- Re: Some of the US software patents (02/27/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/26/04)
- Re: Editors (02/26/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/26/04)
- Some of the US software patents (02/25/04)
- Some tools (02/25/04)
- What, you didn't think any of it was funny? :( (02/24/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: Proposal (02/24/04)
- Re: New Version of Daniela (02/20/04)
- Couldn't get Daniela to assemble (02/19/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/15/04)
- Re: (OT) (02/13/04)
- MASM32 (02/13/04)
- simpler is better (02/13/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/13/04)
- RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/12/04)
- Anti-American... WTF!?! (02/12/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
- Re: links to assembler and tutorials with a bit of history (02/11/04)
- Re: MASM redistribution (02/11/04)
- Re: Betov Licencing System (BLS[tm]) (02/09/04)
- MASM redistribution (02/09/04)
- links to assembler and tutorials with a bit of history (02/09/04)
- Re: Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Has Betov Licensed A86? (02/09/04)
- Re: MS Visual Studio: some kind of "...A Linux Dev environement?" (02/06/04)
Ryan Styles
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/29/04)
Spam Killer
- Re: VBE in W2000 (02/24/04)
- VBE in W2000 (02/24/04)
Stephen Dean Ball
- Re: Strings in asm (02/28/04)
T.M. Sommers
- Re: Editors (02/29/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/24/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/22/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/22/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/22/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/22/04)
- Canonical format (was Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?)) (02/22/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/20/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/19/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/18/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: Thinking assembly? (02/17/04)
- Re: HLA Linux syscalls and related stuff (02/17/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/16/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/14/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/11/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/11/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
Tedd Hill
- Editors (02/23/04)
The Half A Wannabee
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: Confession . Hey I found a use for AoA ! (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Confession . Hey I found a use for AoA ! (02/29/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/29/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/29/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/28/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/28/04)
- Re: Cost of calling a standard library function (02/28/04)
- Re: Tru Calling (02/28/04)
- Cost of calling a standard library function (02/28/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/26/04)
- Re: Softwarepatents in the EU (02/26/04)
- Re: Even brute force was better then Delphi ! (02/26/04)
- Re: Even brute force was better then Delphi ! (02/25/04)
- Even brute force was better then Delphi ! (02/25/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/25/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!! (02/24/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/23/04)
- Re: Editors (02/23/04)
- Crash cource in assembly level 5 (strings version 0.2) (02/23/04)
- Re: I this a program for permant delete of files in M$_DOS? (02/23/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Re: Not your usual DOS program (02/22/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/22/04)
- Beginners Crash course in assembly level 4 (02/18/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/20/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/20/04)
- Re: Beginners Crash course in assembly level 4 (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/19/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Re: Canonical format for header files (02/18/04)
- Beginners Crash course in assembly level 4 (02/18/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/18/04)
- Microsoft reserves all rights not expressly granted to you in this EULA. (02/18/04)
- Re: [OT] Family names (Wieser) (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/17/04)
- Re: Rene's Manifesto (02/17/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/16/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/14/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/14/04)
- Re: ASM32 and response from Intelligent Firmware (02/14/04)
- Re: Development tools...... (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/13/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/13/04)
- Re: RosAsm ... ALL that anyone needs for assembler? (02/13/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
- Re: A letter for Betov to send to Microsoft (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: MOVAPS (SSE) and Windows -> Crash (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/12/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: The Lib debate (02/10/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- I can here Beth typing away somewhere (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- First RosAsm -app- (02/09/04)
- Re: I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/09/04)
- Re: I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/08/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/07/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- I dont think I will regret RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (02/06/04)
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#3) (02/06/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/02/04)
- Re: To Frank (02/01/04)
- Re: Reverse engineering != piracy (was Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro) (02/01/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/01/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/01/04)
The Half a Wannebee
- Re: State of the Union? (02/02/04)
- Re: State of the Union? (02/01/04)
The Mosquito ScriptKiddiot
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/29/04)
- Re: I can here Beth typing away somewhere (02/10/04)
Toby Thain
- Re: tiresome ranting (02/16/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/06/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/05/04)
Tomasz Kornacki
- Re: links to assembler and tutorials with a bit of history (02/11/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/11/04)
- Re: links to assembler and tutorials with a bit of history (02/10/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/10/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/09/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/08/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/07/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/07/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/05/04)
Tomeg Polak
- Re: Caching data (02/13/04)
Trev
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/12/04)
wolfgang kern
- Re: Best integer to string routines (02/28/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/27/04)
- Re: 3 questions... optimization suggestions... and alignment check flag... (02/27/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/27/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/25/04)
- Re: numbers written in ascii... looking for all common (and some uncommon) forms.... (02/25/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/24/04)
- Re: SSE2 int/fp query - MOVHPD (02/23/04)
- Re: SSE2 int/fp query - MOVHPD (02/23/04)
- Re: numbers as ascii, ALSO... mod-r/m and sib bytes as octal... opinions please!!! (02/22/04)
- Re: multiple prefixes from same group... (02/22/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/20/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/20/04)
- Re: Video Mode 13h in windows XP ... impossible? (02/19/04)
- Re: 8080 simulator (02/18/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/18/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/16/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/15/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/15/04)
- Re: simpler is better (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/14/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/11/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/10/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: Q [x86] INT in protected mode? (02/07/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/07/04)
- Re: very accurate clock (02/06/04)
- Re: Programming (02/06/04)
- Re: What is the best windows gui orientated editor? (02/04/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/02/04)
- Re: BethTool ? (02/01/04)
Woody
- Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm (#2) (02/22/04)
- Re: A sample RosAsm macro (actually a whole set) (02/09/04)
- Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?) (02/07/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: RosAsm disassembler output vs. IDA Pro (02/04/04)
- Re: The Case Against RosAsm (#2) (02/01/04)
xby
- Re: Calculate string value at runtime (02/04/04)
Xilo Musimene
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- Re: A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
- A newbie needs help! (02/03/04)
Y
- Q [x86] INT in protected mode? (02/06/04)

Last message date: 02/29/04
Archived on: 02/29/04 CET

1337 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

alt.lang.asmBy Author

alt.lang.asm
By Author