Re: Cost of calling a standard library function
From: hutch-- (hutch_at_movsd.com)
Date: 03/01/04
- Next message: hutch--: "Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!!"
- Previous message: arargh402NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Not your usual DOS program"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Maybe reply: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Feb 2004 15:45:06 -0800
Wannabee,
Don't get your knickers in a knot, its just a matter of fact that
BetovAsm does not handle structures so you must use an array instead.
An array is an abstract as well.
The second pice of code should be a lot faster on a dedicated 16 byte
copy.
You will always have problems posting code in a format that very few
understand and are even less willing to learn and it will be to your
advantage over time to learn the dominant notation as it will expose
you to far more code that is far better written than what you will
have seen so far.
You can get code examples from Intel, AMD and the mountain of properly
written MASM code that is available from many different sources in 32
bit.
Now in that data you will see notation for structures, unions and
other more complex data managing methods and it will be to your
advantage to learn them as it extends your capacity many times over
when you master them.
It does not matter if you are writing in NASM, FASM, MASM, TASM,
GoAsm, GAS or HLA that seems to be able to use most of them, its
whether you have enough capacity to learn how to do the more difficult
stuff and that has finally been what the debate has been about,
capacity.
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
- Next message: hutch--: "Re: A (mild-mannered) defense of RosAsm Rocks !!!"
- Previous message: arargh402NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Not your usual DOS program"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Maybe reply: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|