Re: Cost of calling a standard library function
From: The Half A Wannabee ("The)
Date: 03/03/04
- Next message: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Previous message: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Next in thread: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:51:44 +0100
"Beth" <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> wrote in message
news:Itm1c.87$2F6.40@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net...
> The Half A Wannabee wrote:
> > Beth wrote:
Except for the *** about Rene. Nice artikkel ;-) Rene does not talk crap !
On this we will never agree Beth. Rene, can be a mouthful, but he is usually
correct. But I like your style on just about everything else. And you've a
good heart ;-) And in the end thats what matters. I agree with you, and
Betov btw, that this rectangle optimizing is a bit of waste of time. But as
I see it, its not a waste of time completely, because you learn some things,
that may can come in handy elsewhere.
About sub eax 1 and dec eax. I dont know much about flag usage ;-) I AM
doing this for no more than 5 weeks or something. But testing for jnz is
diffrent the jnc, and jnz will cause an off by one error. jnc exits when 0
have been used, jnz exits before 0 have been used. I have allready done this
error many places in my code, and had to correct them. In fact not all have
been corrected. If this is wrong feel free to correct me.
>
> Beth :)
>
>
- Next message: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Previous message: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Next in thread: C: "Re: Cost of calling a standard library function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]