Re: RosAsm

From: Betov (betov_at_free.fr)
Date: 04/30/04 

Date: 29 Apr 2004 22:59:41 GMT

"Beth" <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> écrivait news:Zrfkc.1711
$74.1534@newsfe1-win:

> Ah, what you mean is: "Why haven't you got anything like Beth's
> 'instant assembly' ideas in RosAsm?"...

I just hope this is not what he means. Not that 'instant
assembly' would be a bad idea. The problem is just that
ideas are cheaper than implementations...

Finaly, the main difference between BethTool and RosAsm
is less with 'instant assembly' than with... 'existence'.
:))

Betov.

< http:://betov.free.fr/RosAsm.html >