Re: RosAsm

From: The Wannabee (faq_at_.@.@.@.@.@szmyggenpv.com)
Date: 04/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:28:17 +0200

På 29 Apr 2004 22:59:41 GMT, skrev Betov <betov@free.fr>:

> "Beth" <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> écrivait news:Zrfkc.1711
> $74.1534@newsfe1-win:
>
>> Ah, what you mean is: "Why haven't you got anything like Beth's
>> 'instant assembly' ideas in RosAsm?"...
>
> I just hope this is not what he means. Not that 'instant
> assembly' would be a bad idea. The problem is just that
> ideas are cheaper than implementations...
>
> Finaly, the main difference between BethTool and RosAsm
> is less with 'instant assembly' than with... 'existence'.
> :))

Lol. You are too cruel. Beth is just thinking about it. But no, I was not
really thinking about instant asm. I was thinking about getting rid of all
kinds of multiple files. But to be able to update the resources as well,
so that they could change while exe runs. But I guess, not possible ? And
embedded directory, inside the exe. ?

>
> Betov.
>
> < http:://betov.free.fr/RosAsm.html > 

-- 
If I am going to *** pepper, then I am going to aim for you.(Hutch)
)*( /   \