Re: RosAsm

From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 04/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:09:59 +0100

Betov wrote:
> Beth wrote:
> > Ah, what you mean is: "Why haven't you got anything like Beth's
> > 'instant assembly' ideas in RosAsm?"...
>
> I just hope this is not what he means. Not that 'instant
> assembly' would be a bad idea. The problem is just that
> ideas are cheaper than implementations...
>
> Finaly, the main difference between BethTool and RosAsm
> is less with 'instant assembly' than with... 'existence'.
> :))

"Fools rush in where angels fear to tread..."

Beth ;)

Quantcast