No need to optimize in assembly anymore

From: a (a_at_a.com)
Date: 05/16/04

  • Next message: BSpider: "Re: Vmode question" 
    Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 18:37:44 +0000 (UTC)

    Given that optimizing in assembly for one processor will have no effect (or
    negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level
    optimization is becoming a waste of time. As processors become more
    sophisticated and diverse in the way they execute code this trend is likely
    to continue.

    Anyone agree?

    DayStar.

  • Next message: BSpider: "Re: Vmode question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore
      ... > negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level ... Optimizing for one processor does ... 1) I'll optimize for whichever CPU is ...
      (comp.lang.asm.x86)
    • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore
      ... > negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level ... Optimizing for one processor does ... 1) I'll optimize for whichever CPU is ...
      (alt.lang.asm)
    • No need to optimize in assembly anymore
      ... Given that optimizing in assembly for one processor will have no effect (or ... negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level ... optimization is becoming a waste of time. ...
      (comp.lang.asm.x86)
    • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore
      ... | Given that optimizing in assembly for one processor will have no effect (or ... | negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level ... HLL, you'll find out the obvious difference. ... who cares about optimised code? ...
      (comp.lang.asm.x86)
    • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore
      ... | Given that optimizing in assembly for one processor will have no effect (or ... | negative effect) on a different processor it seems that low level ... HLL, you'll find out the obvious difference. ... who cares about optimised code? ...
      (alt.lang.asm)