Re: Linux partitions
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 05/18/04
- Next message: Beth: "Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm"
- In reply to: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions"
- Next in thread: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions/bootrecord"
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions/bootrecord"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 18 May 2004 11:37:20 +0300
"wolfgang kern" <nowhere@nevernet.at> writes:
> Thanks Phil,
>
> This is exactly what I searched for, and it's in my preferred format too.
>
> [..]
>
> Perhaps you know about a similar short info about
> my second question, ...oops, I forgot the question mark ;)
>
> | > and where to find what's behind this partitions
> | > (BootRecord-interpretation and DirStructures) ?
>
> [snip copied to my notes]
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
Sorry, I can't help you there. My best suggestion would be to
look at the kernel sources for linux, which supports at least
a few of those partition types.
Phil
-- 1st bug in MS win2k source code found after 20 minutes: scanline.cpp 2nd and 3rd bug found after 10 more minutes: gethost.c Both non-exploitable. (The 2nd/3rd ones might be, depending on the CRTL)
- Next message: Beth: "Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm"
- In reply to: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions"
- Next in thread: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions/bootrecord"
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux partitions/bootrecord"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
