alt.lang.asm
By Author

1462 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 04/30/04
Ending: 05/31/04

• :
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
• _at_(none)
  • Thanks, Randall! (05/19/04)
  • Re: why these regsiters (05/19/04)
  • Re: Assembler test turn project I need some opinions on this? (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/12/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
• a
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/26/04)
  • No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/16/04)
• A. Hitler
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/02/04)
• Alex McDonald
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/16/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (04/30/04)
• AndersX
  • Re: Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/21/04)
  • Re: Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/20/04)
  • Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/18/04)
• Andrew Plotkin
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
• Andrey
  • Debugging programs (05/04/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
• Annie
  • Re: Paris Friend (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: Paris Friend (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/28/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • Re: NASM in DOSEMU (05/28/04)
  • Linux Interrupt List (was: 'Getting NASM from C') (05/28/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/27/04)
  • A.L.A. Photos (was: RosAsm - right click (Annie)) (05/26/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/26/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/23/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: new Microsoft windows vulnerabilty (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/22/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/22/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: MS .Net Question (05/19/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/15/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/12/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/11/04)
  • Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/09/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/08/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/08/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/07/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: Is A(3)86 still used? (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
• Anniw
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
• Apu Kuntur
  • Thanks for your comments! (05/28/04)
  • A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/23/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
• arargh404NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: SCSI ? ? (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
• arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/26/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
• arm_developer
  • I am looking for bootloader for samsung S3C44box chip (05/09/04)
• ASD
  • Paris Friend (05/30/04)
  • 1 (05/10/04)
• assemblyperson
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • NASM in DOSEMU (05/28/04)
  • Getting NASM from C (05/27/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/18/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/17/04)
  • Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/16/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/14/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/11/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/10/04)
  • Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/10/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/06/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
• AsYoDe
  • code optimisation (05/14/04)
• Aubrey McIntosh
  • Assembler to produce PXE NBP (05/31/04)
• Auric__
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: GPL arguments (05/30/04)
  • Re: Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • Re: Book Review (05/22/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is A(3)86 still used? (05/05/04)
• Beth
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/31/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/31/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Linux Interrupt List (was: 'Getting NASM from C') (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/27/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/26/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/26/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/25/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/25/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/25/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/24/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/24/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/24/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/24/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/24/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/24/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/23/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/23/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/23/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/23/04)
  • Re: new Microsoft windows vulnerabilty (05/22/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/22/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/22/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/22/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/22/04)
  • Re: [Luxasm-devel] The "Unified Model" (05/21/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/20/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/20/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/20/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/20/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/20/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/18/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/18/04)
  • Re: Win32Asm and Graphic (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/17/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/17/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/17/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/17/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/17/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/17/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Win32Asm and Graphic (05/17/04)
  • Re: The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/15/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/14/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (05/13/04)
  • Re: The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/12/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/12/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/12/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions (05/12/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 7 (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/11/04)
  • The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/11/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/11/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/09/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/09/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/09/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/09/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/09/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/08/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/08/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/07/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
• Betov
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: Paris Friend (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: Some Windoze assembly examples (05/28/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/28/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • Re: Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/24/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/24/04)
  • Re: MASM32 and Microsoft (05/24/04)
  • Re: MASM32 and Microsoft (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: [Luxasm-devel] The "Unified Model" (05/21/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/18/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/17/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/15/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/14/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/12/04)
  • Re: Win32ASM Community messageboard (05/12/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/12/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/11/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Self-Compiling Assemblers. (05/10/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: Is A(3)86 still used? (05/10/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/08/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
  • Re: Win32ASM Community messageboard (05/07/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/07/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA @forward question... (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA @forward question... (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: Debugging programs (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/02/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (04/30/04)
• Beyond2000!
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • why these regsiters (05/18/04)
• Bill Marcum
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/23/04)
• blackcat
  • Re: Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/05/04)
  • Re: Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/04/04)
  • Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/01/04)
• Bo Persson
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
• Branko Collin
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/26/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
• Brendan Trotter
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/24/04)
  • Re: Masking interrupts (05/14/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
• Bryan Parkoff
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/23/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/21/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/17/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/15/04)
• BSpider
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/30/04)
  • Re: DPMI specs (05/26/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/20/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/20/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/20/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: Win32Asm and Graphic (05/18/04)
  • Re: Win32Asm and Graphic (05/17/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/17/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/17/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/16/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/12/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/05/04)
  • Re: Debugging programs (05/04/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
• Buffalo
  • Re: Vmode question (05/17/04)
  • Re: code optimisation (05/16/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/13/04)
• Bx.C
  • Re: bswap problem (05/07/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/07/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
• Bx.C // Shiragajin
  • Re: Vmode question (05/15/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/15/04)
• C
  • Ann: Luxasm 00.01.07 : 2004-05-30 (05/30/04)
  • Re: [Luxasm-devel] The "Unified Model" (05/21/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Label composition (05/13/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/13/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: ASM on Linux (05/09/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/02/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/01/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/01/04)
• Cedric Knight
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
• CescoZzzz
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (long) (05/06/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/04/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/03/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/03/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/02/04)
• Charles Banas
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/03/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
• Chewy509
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: new Microsoft windows vulnerabilty (05/23/04)
  • Re: new Microsoft windows vulnerabilty (05/22/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/22/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/16/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/09/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/09/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/09/04)
• Chris
  • CTRL-ALT-t, Please help me (05/31/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
• Dan
  • Can anyone help me with my delay loop problem? (05/07/04)
• davidjones_at_optonline.net
  • My Gay Partner Shoveing an Apple up His Anus (05/01/04)
• daystar
  • Is A(3)86 still used? (05/05/04)
• don
  • why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/21/04)
• donkey
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/31/04)
  • Re: GPL arguments (05/30/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/30/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/30/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/25/04)
• Ed Beroset
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• eGze
  • Re: imghdr.inc (05/29/04)
  • imghdr.inc (05/29/04)
• Eric
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: MS .Net Question (05/19/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/19/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: I am looking for bootloader for samsung S3C44box chip (05/09/04)
  • Re: ASM on Linux (05/09/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/09/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/08/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/08/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/07/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/07/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
  • Re: Debugging with Nasm (05/05/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/05/04)
  • bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/02/04)
  • Re: Debugging with Nasm (05/02/04)
• Eric Smith
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
• Erik Max Francis
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
• ernobe
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/15/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
• Evenbit
  • Sherbert's 75 bites (05/30/04)
  • Me learn to count (one, two, free..) (05/30/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/28/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/28/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/28/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/28/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • Re: NASM in DOSEMU (05/28/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: Please help (05/27/04)
  • Re: LindowsOS (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/24/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/24/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/24/04)
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/24/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/24/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/24/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/21/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/21/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/21/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/21/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/19/04)
  • Re: MS .Net Question (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/16/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/14/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/15/04)
  • Re: The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/14/04)
  • Re: retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] is this dns ok? (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/12/04)
  • Re: Test Mail (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/11/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/11/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
• flekso
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
• Frank Kotler
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.07 : 2004-05-30 (05/31/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/26/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/25/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: [Luxasm-devel] The "Unified Model" (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/20/04)
  • Re: [Luxasm-devel] The "Unified Model" (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/19/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/19/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/17/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/17/04)
  • Re: Filenames (8.3 conversion) (05/17/04)
  • Re: Why (05/17/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/16/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/11/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/10/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/10/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/06/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/02/04)
  • Re: Debugging with Nasm (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (04/30/04)
• Gabriele Avosani
  • new Microsoft windows vulnerabilty (05/22/04)
• Gavioli Sara
  • Re: Win32Asm and Graphic (05/19/04)
  • Win32Asm and Graphic (05/16/04)
• Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
• Green Cochoa
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/04/04)
  • Re: Debugging programs (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Questions about the HLA installation... (05/02/04)
• Heinz-Dietrich Saupe
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/25/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/09/04)
  • Re: SMP (05/08/04)
  • SMP (05/08/04)
• Herbert Kleebauer
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: MASM32 and Microsoft (05/23/04)
  • Re: Book Review (05/22/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/12/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: Can anyone help me with my delay loop problem? (05/07/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/05/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/05/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/02/04)
  • Re: Self-Compiling Assemblers. (05/02/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (05/01/04)
  • Re: Self-Compiling Assemblers. (05/01/04)
• Herman Dullink
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: porting DOS asm code on linux (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
• Howard_Goth
  • Shapes (05/05/04)
• hutch--
  • The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: MASM32 and Microsoft (05/24/04)
  • Re: MASM32 and Microsoft (05/24/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/18/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/18/04)
  • Re: Why (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/15/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/15/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/14/04)
• Ivan Korotkov
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/24/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/23/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
• J. Yazel
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
• James Tryand
  • Re: Newbie Question. How to determine DLL Export Prototype Parameters? (05/21/04)
  • Newbie Question. How to determine DLL Export Prototype Parameters? (05/20/04)
• Jim Brain
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• Jim Carlock
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/31/04)
  • Re: GPL arguments (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/29/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/25/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/24/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • MS .Net Question (05/18/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/17/04)
  • Re: Victory! (05/16/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: The "New Lesson" to be learnt (was: LuxAsm 00.01.00) (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Victory! (05/13/04)
  • Victory! (05/13/04)
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
• jis
  • MAC-1 assembler (05/15/04)
• John Dahlman
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/15/04)
• John Miller
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
• John W. Kennedy
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/31/04)
• Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: Book Review (05/24/04)
• jorgon
  • Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
• jova
  • Assembler test turn project I need some opinions on this? (05/14/04)
  • ASSembler test turn project I need some opinions on this? (05/14/04)
  • retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
• Kain
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/25/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/19/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/09/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/01/04)
• karensmith_at_optonline.net
  • Princess Diana Nude, From Photo Archives (05/01/04)
• Karl Ove Hufthammer
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/21/04)
• L. Ross Raszewski
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• luvr
  • LindowsOS (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/23/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/15/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/14/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (04/30/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (04/30/04)
• Matt
  • HLA newbie stuck.. (05/13/04)
• Matt Taylor
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/31/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/24/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/23/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/20/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/19/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
• Matthew Russotto
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
• Michael Hunter
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• mjt
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
• Nathan C. Baker
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/05/04)
  • Re: Is A(3)86 still used? (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/05/04)
  • Re: avrt- OT (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/05/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/05/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/05/04)
  • Re: Shapes (05/05/04)
• Nikos Chantziaras
  • Re: Open Source adventure ideas (05/25/04)
• NoDot
  • Re: Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/24/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/24/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/15/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/14/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/14/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/12/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/12/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/11/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/11/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/05/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/02/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/02/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
  • Re: The best Assembler. (05/01/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
• pacman128_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/02/04)
• Paul Allen Panks
  • Re: [OT] I published a book! :) (05/29/04)
  • New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/28/04)
  • Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • MASM32 and Microsoft (05/23/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Open Source adventure ideas (05/18/04)
  • HLA Adventure updated (05/15/04)
  • Another version for Linux/Windows (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/12/04)
  • HLA next version? (05/12/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/10/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/10/04)
  • HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
  • HLA Adventure update... :) (05/06/04)
  • HLA @forward question... (05/06/04)
• Paul Colquhoun
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
• Pavel Srubar
  • Re: Win32ASM Community messageboard (05/12/04)
  • Win32ASM Community messageboard (05/07/04)
• Pete
  • Revolutionary Assembly Language (05/26/04)
• Peter
  • SCSI ? ? (05/04/04)
• pH
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
• Phil Carmody
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/31/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/31/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/29/04)
  • Linux syscalls (05/28/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/28/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/18/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions (05/18/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions (05/11/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/09/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/08/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/08/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/08/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/06/04)
  • Re: Debugging with Nasm (05/05/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/05/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/04/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/03/04)
• Pissing Bandit
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
• PlasmaDragon
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/24/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/22/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (04/30/04)
• pmb
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
• Profetas
  • Please help (05/27/04)
  • Re: Project Idea. (05/23/04)
  • Project Idea. (05/22/04)
  • Book Review (05/21/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/19/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/19/04)
  • Disassembler (05/18/04)
• RADIUM
  • Debugging with Nasm (05/02/04)
• Randall Hyde
  • Re: GPL arguments (05/31/04)
  • Re: Luxasm 00.01.07 : 2004-05-30 (05/30/04)
  • GPL arguments (05/30/04)
  • Re: NASM in DOSEMU (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: New HLA-related Blog (The Bloggin' Times) (05/29/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/27/04)
  • HLA Document Problems on Webster Corrected (05/26/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/23/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.64 is now available (05/22/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/21/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/20/04)
  • HLA v1.64 is now available (05/20/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/20/04)
  • Re: Thanks, Randall! (05/20/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA next version? (05/12/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/10/04)
  • The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • RosAsm, still trying to add conditional assembly (05/07/04)
  • Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: HLA @forward question... (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/02/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/02/04)
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/01/04)
  • Re: Self-Compiling Assemblers. (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
  • Self-Compiling Assemblers. (05/01/04)
• Richard Bos
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
• Richard Hayden
  • IA-32 Overflow Query (05/02/04)
• Rick D.
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
• rjb
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/27/04)
  • Re: DPMI specs (05/26/04)
  • DPMI specs (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/20/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/20/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/19/04)
  • Re: 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • 32.bit com (05/19/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/15/04)
  • Re: Vmode question (05/15/04)
  • Masking interrupts (05/13/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/12/04)
  • Vmode question (05/12/04)
  • Re: ASM on Linux (05/09/04)
  • ASM on Linux (05/08/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/08/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/07/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
  • low-level format (05/04/04)
• Ro
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/26/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/22/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] is this dns ok? (05/12/04)
  • [OT] is this dns ok? (05/06/04)
• Robert G Durnal
  • Re: DOS shutdown (05/07/04)
  • DOS shutdown (05/06/04)
  • Re: Is A(3)86 still used? (05/06/04)
• Robert Redelmeier
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/30/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/19/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: low-level format (05/04/04)
• Roger Firth
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
• Roy Jones
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/14/04)
  • I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/12/04)
• Sam Gillett
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/31/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
• Scott Moore
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/31/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/28/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/20/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/19/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
• shonamorrison_at_optonline.net
  • Princess Diana Nude, From Photo Archives (05/01/04)
• snpphakel
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
• Spam Killer
  • Re: Book Review (05/26/04)
  • Re: Lucida Font (05/23/04)
  • Lucida Font (05/23/04)
  • Re: Debugging with Nasm (05/02/04)
• Stas Starkov
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• T.M. Sommers
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/31/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/28/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/22/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/14/04)
  • Re: Ann: Luxasm 00.01.00 (2004-04-08) (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/13/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/11/04)
  • Re: HLA Under Linux question... (05/11/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/10/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/08/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/08/04)
• The Half a Wanna bee
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/10/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/09/04)
• The Half a Wannebee
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/28/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/08/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm? (05/01/04)
• The Mosquito
  • Re: Book Review (05/22/04)
  • Re: Why (05/16/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: Shapes (05/05/04)
• The Wannabee
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/31/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/30/04)
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/29/04)
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Getting NASM from C (05/29/04)
  • Re: Some Windoze assembly examples (05/28/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/27/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/27/04)
  • Re: Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • Re: Converting programs to assembly (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/27/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/26/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/24/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/24/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/24/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/24/04)
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/21/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie Question. How to determine DLL Export Prototype Parameters? (05/20/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/20/04)
  • Re: Disassembler (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/18/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/17/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: Why (05/16/04)
  • Re: Why (05/16/04)
  • Re: Assemblyperson's Competitor Support (05/16/04)
  • Why (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/16/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/16/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/15/04)
  • Re: I got a response from Microsoft Permission/Copyright group regarding masm (05/15/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/15/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/14/04)
  • Re: retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
  • Re: retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
  • Re: retreiving data from subprograms (05/14/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/14/04)
  • Is easy to understand (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: Victory! (05/13/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/13/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: Detecting Sound Card Under DOS (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/12/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/12/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/11/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 7 (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/11/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Re: Test Mail (05/11/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/11/04)
  • Re: Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 7 (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 6 (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 5 (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 4 (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 3 (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 2 (05/11/04)
  • A firendly review of Windows Programming in Assemble Language" Chapter 1 (05/11/04)
  • A Friendly review of "Window programming in assembly language" - INTRO (05/11/04)
  • Plese remove all referanses to HLA, please ???? Dear God. Please remove all referanses to HLA. (05/11/04)
  • Test Mail (05/10/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/09/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/09/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: The End of Moore's Law (05/08/04)
  • Re: Question regarding "HLA" and its validity. (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/08/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/07/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/07/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/07/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: New to Debian Linux - I have NASM experience under DOS 6.22 (05/07/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/07/04)
  • Re: HLA @forward question... (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/06/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/05/04)
  • Re: HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/05/04)
  • Re: Shapes (05/05/04)
  • Re: Shapes (05/05/04)
  • HLA - syntax (which can just simply no be used) (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: Does anyone have a Front Cover Scan of Michael Abrash's "Zen of Assembly Language"? (05/04/04)
  • Re: Debugging programs (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/04/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/02/04)
  • Re: avrt- OT (05/02/04)
  • Re: Questions about the HLA installation... (05/02/04)
  • OT : To Annike. (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (04/30/04)
• The_Sage
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies (05/31/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: why is nobody developing assembly IDE's (05/23/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/20/04)
  • Re: What Randy tells his students (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: A Friendly review of "Windows Programming in Assemble Language" chapter 3 (05/12/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/06/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/04/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/02/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/02/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/02/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
• Tim Roberts
  • Re: bswap problem (05/06/04)
• Tom Lake
  • Re: The Public Domain (05/23/04)
• Trammel
  • Re: The neo-nazi Board mask falls down (05/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to learn but stuck (Listing inside) (05/05/04)
  • Re: Trying to learn but stuck (Listing inside) (05/05/04)
  • Trying to learn but stuck (Listing inside) (05/05/04)
• twisteddweeb_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/18/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/14/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/11/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/11/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/10/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/10/04)
• wolfgang kern
  • Re: Linux syscalls (05/30/04)
  • Re: Me learn to count (one, two, free..) (05/30/04)
  • Re: Paris Friend (05/30/04)
  • Re: Sherbert's 75 bites (05/30/04)
  • Re: imghdr.inc (05/30/04)
  • Re: imghdr.inc (05/29/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/26/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/25/04)
  • Re: A question regarding illegal Opcodes. (05/24/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (Re:Annie) (05/22/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/22/04)
  • Re: Mippy the Dragon...yay or nay? (05/21/04)
  • Re: Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/21/04)
  • Re: Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/20/04)
  • Re: Enhanced Unicode support for "Go" tools (05/19/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/19/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/19/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions/bootrecord (05/19/04)
  • Re: Performance problem when using 'movaps' SSE instruction. (05/19/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/18/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/17/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/16/04)
  • Re: Linux Sys Calls - int 80h (05/15/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/14/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA Adventure now works under Linux, too! :) (05/13/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions (05/12/04)
  • Re: Linux partitions (05/12/04)
  • Linux partitions (05/11/04)
  • Re: Help With An ASM Instruction (05/10/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/08/04)
  • Re: sorted equates member-groups (05/08/04)
  • Re: Article on low-level program on O'Reilly Site (05/08/04)
  • sorted equates member-groups (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click OT#4 (05/06/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/05/04)
  • Re: bswap problem (05/05/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/03/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/03/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/03/04)
  • Re: IA-32 Overflow Query (05/02/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/02/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: Randall Hyde's essay "Which assembler is the best?" (05/01/04)
  • Re: What exactly is Protected Mode? (05/01/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (05/01/04)
  • Re: RosAsm - right click (04/30/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (04/30/04)
  • Re: RosAsm (04/30/04)
• Woody
  • Re: DirectX in HLA (05/18/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)
  • Re: HLA newbie stuck.. (05/14/04)

Last message date: 05/31/04
Archived on: 05/31/04 CEST

---

1462 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)