Re: Linux syscalls
From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 06/01/04
- Next message: arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Assembler to produce PXE NBP"
- Previous message: Frank Kotler: "Re: Assembler to produce PXE NBP"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Zdenek Sojka: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:59:07 +0100
wolfgang kern wrote:
> Even If it may hurt you Beth, (my inspireing jumping ghost aka
"Muse"),
> I have to second Annies's notes above this time ...
What? Even Annie's thinly veiled "***" implication at the end:
as if "out-of-wedlock pregancy" was some kind of "inevitabilty"
for me?
Well, thank you very much, wolfgang...
Ah, you're just getting revenge for the "mushroom" joke I made
before, yeah? Okay, fair enough...evens now ;)...
Beth :)
- Next message: arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Assembler to produce PXE NBP"
- Previous message: Frank Kotler: "Re: Assembler to produce PXE NBP"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Maybe reply: Zdenek Sojka: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]