Re: Linux syscalls
arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: Auric__: "Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies"
- Previous message: BSpider: "Re: DPMI raw mode switch"
- In reply to: arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:38:41 -0500
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:05:30 -0500, arargh405NOSPAM@NOW.AT.arargh.com
wrote:
<snip>
>>It also looks very much like `ntldr` is an MS-DOS *.COM file.
>>But I don't pretend to be an MS-WinNT expert.
>Yes, the first instruction does look the same, however ANY program can
>start with a short jump. I would have to disassemble it, but it is
>almost certainly a stand alone program.
ntldr (NT4 version) makes NO Int 21h calls. It also enters protected
mode, which is unlikely for a DOS program. It is a mixed-mode 16bit
real and 32bit protected program from what a quick look tells me.
IMO, a stand alone program.
-- Arargh405 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html To reply by email, remove the garbage from the reply address.
- Next message: Auric__: "Re: A fucking bunch of lying pussies"
- Previous message: BSpider: "Re: DPMI raw mode switch"
- In reply to: arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Linux syscalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]