Re: Pre-boot validation

From: assemblyperson (assemblyperson_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/07/04

  • Next message: BSpider: "Re: Locked memory" 
    Date: 7 Jun 2004 07:39:25 -0700

    "Beth" <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> wrote in message news:<LSSwc.1$yL2.0@newsfe2-win>...
    > assemblyperson wrote:
    > > Beth,
    >
    > Yes?
    .
    .
    .

    > Not completely sure what you mean by "decentralise"...I wasn't
    > aware that anything was "centralised" here that needed to be
    > "decentralised"...so, I can't really make any useful comment on
    > that here because, simply, I don't really know what you're
    > talking about here...not to say that it doesn't make sense or
    > whatever...but just that I don't recognise what you mean at the
    > moment...what's "centralised" that needs to be "decentralised"?
    >
    > Beth :)

    Beth,

    For about 18 years now, I have had a dream of helping to decentralize
    the OS market. It is the Microsoft dominance that I see as unhealthy
    as retarding progress. I would like to see a few hundred OS vendors
    who strive to be compatible with the public-domain protocols on the
    Internet. These vendors could easily overtake 50% of the market
    (collectively) because real needs are so diverse. Parallel
    processing, robotics, chemical process control, instant-on appliances,
    and literally thousands more areas would not be thinking in terms of
    one standard OS on one standard hardware platform. Computing devices
    and even operating systems on common PCs would more readily utilize
    the imagination of small business instead of buying into proprietary
    standards that are worse than useless.

    Thank you for reading my harrang.

    assemblyperson@yahoo.com

  • Next message: BSpider: "Re: Locked memory"