Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?
From: Auric__ (not.my.real_at_email.address)
Date: 07/08/04
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: ASM vs HLL : absurd war"
- In reply to: Jim Carlock: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Next in thread: Bx.Cornwell: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Reply: Bx.Cornwell: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:43:32 -0700
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:24:16 GMT, Jim Carlock wrote:
>Somewhere I read something about objects that represent a
>dimension past the length, width and height dimensions. Which
>means you can stretch a cube in another direction. And there's
>some fancy name for the resulting object that is something like
>dodecahedron. But at the time of reading, the fourth dimension
>was described as time.
Tesseract - 4d equivalent to the cube. Dodecahedron is a 3d object with
12 faces.
-- auric underscore underscore at hotmail dot com ***** The fact that you find this strange makes me want to run away very, very quickly.
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: ASM vs HLL : absurd war"
- In reply to: Jim Carlock: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Next in thread: Bx.Cornwell: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Reply: Bx.Cornwell: "Re: 4 dimensions or 10 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|