Re: turn off for learning assembler
From: Dunny (paul.dunn4_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Betov: "Re: Yet Another RosAsm Symbol table problem"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: ASM vs HLL : absurd war"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Next in thread: The Wannabee: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Reply: The Wannabee: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:06:10 +0100
In news:LWxHc.964$bI4.105@newsfe3-win.ntli.net,
Beth <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> typed:
> The problem is not that Mother Nature couldn't
> "self-correct"...of course this happens or the planet would have
> been buggered long since...the problem is that if we're
> attacking on two fronts like this (multiple fronts, we're
> unfortunately "tipping the balance" in all directions in all
> manner of ways simultaneously), then She has the "Hitler
> problem"...she can't fight on two different fronts at the same
> time...and if she loses the battle, then so do we implicitly
> because we're living on her planet...
I think that the idea that the human race can "destroy/wipe out the planet" is
pretty boastful. At best, we're capable of wiping out ourselves and a large
chunk of life with us - but certainly not capable of destroying the planet.
Given a few million years, things would be pretty much back to how they were
before we stumbled along, and Mother Nature would hardly hav registered a blip.
D.
- Next message: Betov: "Re: Yet Another RosAsm Symbol table problem"
- Previous message: Betov: "Re: ASM vs HLL : absurd war"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Next in thread: The Wannabee: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Reply: The Wannabee: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: turn off for learning assembler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]