Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files
From: Betov (betov_at_free.fr)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Betov: "Re: I think i finally got a definition of an Assembler!"
- Previous message: Eric P.: "Re: Debug.exe for win32"
- In reply to: Randall Hyde: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Next in thread: Percival: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Reply: Percival: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 07 Sep 2004 07:40:27 GMT
"Randall Hyde" <randyhyde@earthlink.net> écrivait news:XB6%c.9333$w%
6.2141@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> Consider the following HLA statement:
>
> stdout.put( "Hello World, I=", i, " j=", j, " s=", s, nl );
>
> Only a few characters appearing in a source file, right?
> The problem with that theory is that "stdout.put" is a *macro*
> invocation. This macro expands to over 500 statements
> *for each parameter supplied to the macro).
:)) :)) :)) :)) :))
You should really learn the basics of Assembly
Programming...
:)) :)) :)) :)) :))
Betov.
< http://betov.free.fr/RosAsm.html >
- Next message: Betov: "Re: I think i finally got a definition of an Assembler!"
- Previous message: Eric P.: "Re: Debug.exe for win32"
- In reply to: Randall Hyde: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Next in thread: Percival: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Reply: Percival: "Re: Monofiles vs Splitting into many files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]