Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS...
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 10/21/04
- Next message: C: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Previous message: C: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- In reply to: Randall Hyde: "Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS..."
- Next in thread: The_Sage: "Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Oct 2004 10:26:34 +0300
"Randall Hyde" <randyhyde@earthlink.net> writes:
> xyz dd 0
>
> are not processor dependent.
The concept of 'word' and 'doubleword' are, though.
(Their size, and their endianness.)
Phil
-- They no longer do my traditional winks tournament lunch - liver and bacon. It's just what you need during a winks tournament lunchtime to replace lost ... liver. -- Anthony Horton, 2004/08/27 at the Cambridge 'Long Vac.'
- Next message: C: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Previous message: C: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- In reply to: Randall Hyde: "Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS..."
- Next in thread: The_Sage: "Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|