alt.lang.asm
By Author

1000 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 11/01/04

• Al
  • SVGA & VGA technical docs (10/03/04)
• Al Leitch
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/16/04)
  • Re: a86 (10/09/04)
  • Macros using GAS? (10/09/04)
  • Re: netfuncs.inc: useful ConnectTo function (10/09/04)
  • netfuncs.inc: useful ConnectTo function (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: More Reviews (10/05/04)
  • current location symbol in GAS? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/03/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/03/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
• Alex McDonald
  • *Your* definition [was Re: *The* definition of assembly langauge] (10/31/04)
• Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
• Andy
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: EWX_POWEROFF code right ? (10/29/04)
  • EWX_POWEROFF code right ? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/24/04)
  • Win32 code newsgroups (10/22/04)
• Annie
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/21/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/20/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/20/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/19/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/02/04)
• arargh410NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/19/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/19/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
• Arich Chanachai
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/04/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/04/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/02/04)
• Atelier Ghost
  • Assembler Notation? (10/20/04)
• Auric__
  • Re: [Help] Disasmbler (10/14/04)
• Ben Yates
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
• Beth
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/27/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/12/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/12/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/11/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/11/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/11/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/09/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/09/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/08/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/05/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/05/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/02/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/02/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/02/04)
  • Re: Licensing (open-source) (10/02/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/02/04)
  • Re: ASM objects? (10/01/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/01/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
• Betov
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: LOOP & REP syntax? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: rosasm: dialog box + status bar (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/26/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/26/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/24/04)
  • Release of RosAsm V.2.006a (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/22/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/11/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/09/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/09/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/04/04)
• Bill Vermillion
  • Re: Excercices (10/19/04)
• Brendan Trotter
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/04/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/01/04)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: Excercices (10/19/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
• Buffalo
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/29/04)
• C
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: debugging symbols in nasm/linux (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/19/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/18/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/10/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/02/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/02/04)
  • Re: stack exploits, was: AMD 64-bit w/o paging? (10/02/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
  • Re: ASM objects? (10/01/04)
• Caleb
  • Re: My own variables (10/14/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/14/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/13/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/13/04)
  • My own variables (10/13/04)
• Calm n Collected
  • Win32 assembly printer code (10/28/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/27/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • Re: Win32 code newsgroups (10/23/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Excercices (10/19/04)
• Charles P.
  • Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/08/04)
• Charlie Gibbs
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
• Chewy509
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/26/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/25/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/11/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/04/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/03/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/03/04)
• Chip
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/31/04)
• Dag Viken
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
• Darchon Krieger
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
• Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/03/04)
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/03/04)
• Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/15/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/15/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/15/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/13/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/13/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/12/04)
• Dunny
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
• Evenbit
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/26/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/26/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/16/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/16/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/15/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/15/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/10/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/10/04)
  • Re: "Write Great Code" Announcement (10/10/04)
  • Re: "Write Great Code" Announcement (10/10/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/10/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/06/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/06/04)
• Florian Liebig
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and (10/19/04)
• Frank Kotler
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/27/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/25/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: ntstatus.inc (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: debugging symbols in nasm/linux (10/18/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/14/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/03/04)
• FreeZ
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/18/04)
• Gabriele Neukam
  • Re: YASM (10/28/04)
• glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
• Grumble
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and (10/22/04)
• Herbert Kleebauer
  • Re: Excercices (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/26/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/26/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/08/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/06/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/06/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/06/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/03/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/02/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
• Herman Dullink
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
• http://tinyurl.com/ii35
  • Re: throw a molotov cocktail through the window of matt parker (10/27/04)
• hutch--
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Master_RTF (10/16/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/12/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/02/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
  • Re: Licensing (open-source) (10/01/04)
  • Re: Licensing (open-source) (10/01/04)
• IIJIMA Hiromitsu
  • Re: Win32 code newsgroups (10/23/04)
  • Re: Win32 code newsgroups (10/23/04)
• James Van Buskirk
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/20/04)
• Jason
  • Re: x86 addressing (10/02/04)
  • Re: x86 addressing (10/02/04)
  • Re: x86 addressing (10/02/04)
• JC
  • [Help] Disasmbler (10/14/04)
• Jeremy Gordon
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/29/04)
• Jim Carlock
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/04/04)
  • Re: Complete takeover by .NET? (10/02/04)
  • DEP (Data Execution Prevention) (10/02/04)
  • Re: The DLLMain... (09/30/04)
• John Found
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/03/04)
• Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/11/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Programming from the Ground Up News (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
• Kain
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/19/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
• Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
• KiLVaiDeN
  • Re: Write Great Code is now Available (10/28/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/09/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: AoA Review (10/05/04)
  • Re: AoA Review (10/05/04)
• laura fairhead
  • Re: Excercices (10/29/04)
• luvr
  • Re: Getting Mozilla Thunderbird to interface with Usenet (10/06/04)
• mark thomas
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/11/04)
• michi
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/11/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
  • How to output a number (10/10/04)
• networm
  • how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/12/04)
• Nico
  • Re: ntstatus.inc (10/20/04)
  • ntstatus.inc (10/19/04)
  • help for going into Ring 0? (10/15/04)
• NoDot
  • Re: *The* definition of assembly langauge (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/31/04)
  • Re: *The* definition of assembly langauge (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: Write Great Code is now Available (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/26/04)
  • Re: HLA v1.72 is now available (10/26/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: How to display character (10/16/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/05/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/05/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/02/04)
• Paul
  • Re: CPU-types (10/19/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/10/04)
• Paulo R. Dallan
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
• PBSL
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem SOLVED (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
• Penang
  • YASM (10/28/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/28/04)
• Percival
  • Re: *The* definition of assembly langauge (10/31/04)
  • Re: *The* definition of assembly langauge (10/31/04)
  • Re: Another random Idea for assembly authors (10/31/04)
  • Another random Idea for assembly authors (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/26/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/26/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/19/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/18/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/12/04)
  • Re: "Write Great Code" Announcement (10/11/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/09/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/09/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/08/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: ASM & CPU's (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/05/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/03/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (09/30/04)
• Peter
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/26/04)
  • AMD assembly level? (10/25/04)
• Phil Carmody
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/31/04)
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/30/04)
  • 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: 1984 (was: Why Bush?) (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/19/04)
  • Re: debugging symbols in nasm/linux (10/19/04)
  • Re: debugging symbols in nasm/linux (10/19/04)
  • debugging symbols in nasm/linux (10/18/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/05/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/01/04)
  • Re: GAS assembly quirks (10/01/04)
  • Re: Troll, Only One (10/01/04)
  • GAS assembly quirks (10/01/04)
• Pirabhu Raman
  • Newbie question (10/21/04)
• Randall Hyde
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: Write Great Code is now Available (10/28/04)
  • Write Great Code is now Available (10/28/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Some changes to Webster (10/27/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/27/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/27/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/26/04)
  • HLA v1.72 is now available (10/26/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
  • Parsing Integer and Real values (10/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: Win32 code newsgroups (10/23/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/23/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • HLA v1.71 is now available (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/18/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Master_RTF (10/14/04)
  • Re: [Help] Disasmbler (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/10/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/10/04)
  • Re: Programming from the Ground Up News (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/09/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/09/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/08/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/07/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/06/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/06/04)
  • "Write Great Code" Announcement (10/06/04)
  • Re: static vs var (10/06/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/06/04)
  • Re: AoA Review (10/05/04)
  • Re: More Reviews (10/05/04)
  • More Reviews (10/05/04)
  • AoA Review (10/05/04)
  • Re: current location symbol in GAS? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/03/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/03/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/02/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/01/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (09/30/04)
• Ray M. Ransom
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/27/04)
• Relvinian
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/02/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/02/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/01/04)
  • Re: HLA and debugging information (10/01/04)
• RMB
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
• Ro
  • *The* definition of assembly langauge (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/31/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/29/04)
  • A new assembly language (10/29/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/28/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/28/04)
  • rosasm: dialog box + status bar (10/28/04)
  • data - nasm - macros (10/28/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/27/04)
  • Re: some nasm macros (10/27/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/27/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/27/04)
  • some nasm macros (10/26/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: A window problem (10/21/04)
  • A window problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: How to output a number (10/17/04)
  • Re: asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/09/04)
  • asm + programming in windows 32 bit (10/09/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/09/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/08/04)
  • Re: string and code in nasm (10/08/04)
  • Re: Catagories of Assembly Languages (10/08/04)
  • Re: A Disassembly Problem for Rene to Consider (10/08/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/06/04)
  • string and code in nasm (10/06/04)
  • Re: RosAsm V.2.005a (10/04/04)
• Robert Redelmeier
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Help needed re DOS problem (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/17/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: current location symbol in GAS? (10/05/04)
  • Re: Licensing (open-source) (10/01/04)
  • Re: Licensing (open-source) (10/01/04)
• rombios
  • Re: Send me your ROM-BIOS! (10/28/04)
  • Send me your ROM-BIOS! (10/27/04)
• Roy Jones
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/19/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
• Slasher
  • req: A386 or converter to masm (10/08/04)
• Socket
  • Re: [Help] Disasmbler (10/14/04)
• Stefanos
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Which assembler to choose? (10/16/04)
• Stephane Hockenhull
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/02/04)
  • stack exploits, was: AMD 64-bit w/o paging? (10/02/04)
• Stephen Riehm
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
• Steve O'Hara-Smith
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
• T.M. Sommers
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/30/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/28/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/24/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/17/04)
  • Re: Which assembler to choose? (10/17/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/17/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/16/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/15/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/12/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/11/04)
  • Re: Macros using GAS? (10/10/04)
  • Re: current location symbol in GAS? (10/05/04)
• tenshi
  • Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
• The Wannabee
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (11/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: LOOP & REP syntax? (10/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: EWX_POWEROFF code right ? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/29/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: My latest Windoze assembly application (10/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/28/04)
  • Re: Send me your ROM-BIOS! (10/27/04)
  • Re: My pick for the '04 election - None of the above (10/27/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/26/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/26/04)
  • Re: Learning assembly? (10/25/04)
• The_Sage
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/30/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: A new assembly language (10/29/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/29/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/23/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/23/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/22/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/21/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/20/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/19/04)
  • Re: The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/18/04)
  • The textbook ASSEMBLERS AND LOADERS... (10/17/04)
• Tim Roberts
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/16/04)
• Toby Thain
  • Re: A compiler theory doc by lcc-win32 creator (10/17/04)
• TS
  • Re: Send me your ROM-BIOS! (10/28/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/27/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/26/04)
  • Re: AMD assembly level? (10/25/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/14/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/13/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/07/04)
  • Re: APJ released a new issue! (10/01/04)
• w m r
  • Re: Multiprocessor ASM?? (10/05/04)
• wolfgang kern
  • Re: LOOP & REP syntax? (10/31/04)
  • Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows) (10/31/04)
  • Re: 2-in-1 - Profiling NASM, and/or VTune on a P4 (10/31/04)
  • Re: LOOP & REP syntax? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Win32 assembly printer code (10/29/04)
  • LOOP & REP syntax? (10/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Assembler Notation? (10/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/20/04)
  • Re: Herc Mode On VGA Card (10/19/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/19/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/19/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/18/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/17/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/16/04)
  • Re: Books on why programmers think more than coding (10/15/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/14/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/14/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/14/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/13/04)
  • Re: how to read/set the display card's gamma table and whitepoint/temperature settings? (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: Excercices (10/13/04)
  • Re: My own variables (10/13/04)
  • Re: CPU-types (10/13/04)
  • CPU-types (10/13/04)
  • Re: Assembly Question (10/09/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (10/08/04)
  • Re: Excercices - 1 Exercise completed (10/07/04)
  • Re: ASM objects? (10/02/04)
• xx
  • Re: [OT] Why Bush? (10/30/04)
• Zdenek Sojka
  • Re: x ^ y (09/30/04)

Last message date: 11/01/04
Archived on: 10/31/04 CET

---

1000 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Assembler  > alt.lang.asm  > 2004-10