Re: [OT] Paging Frank K. (was: ' [OT] Why Bush?')

From: Annie (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/09/04

  • Next message: Annie: "Re: [OT] Paging Frank K. (was: ' [OT] Why Bush?')" 
    Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:18:20 +0000 (UTC)

    On 2004-11-09 BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com said:

    > Indeed, if I didn't say "it'll never work" then - Murphy's Law - it
    > probably wouldn't...I _have_ to say it or I'd be "jinxing" your
    > experiments to failure...as I say, I _HAD TO_ be a "nut" to inspire
    > people to get so annoyed with me being a "nut" that you've decided
    > to create the invention to prove I'm a "nut"...the strange "swings
    > and roundabouts" of the world...
    >
    > You work on your device, I'll work on my "decentralised" devices
    > and to the winner go the spoils, yes? Now, finally, some _healthy_
    > competition that's constructive, not destructive...and from the
    > least expected source...it really is impossible to predict this
    > world, isn't it?
                                                 _____
           Once again, Beth, you've managed ((( `\
           to totally misinterpret the _ _`\ )
           situation. (^ ) )
                                                 ~-( )
           My building the device has nothing _'((,,,)))
           whatsoever to do with -YOU- (diff- ,-' \_/ `\
           icult as that might be to grasp). ( , |
                                              `-.-'`-.-'/|_|
           Like Wolfgang, I've been playing \ / | |
           with unusual electrical devices =()=: / ,' aa
           for years...long before I ever
           knew of your existence.

           However, I'm willing to compromise. If the device
           fails to function as advertised, I'll happily
           name it the Beth-O-Tron. Fair enough? Hehe!

  • Next message: Annie: "Re: [OT] Paging Frank K. (was: ' [OT] Why Bush?')"