Re: [OT] Why Bush?
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 11/09/04
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: Any Danger With The "Buffer Overflow Exploits" by using Assembler Language ?"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- In reply to: Annie: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Next in thread: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 09 Nov 2004 17:21:41 +0200
"Annie" <me@privacy.net> writes:
> On 2004-11-08 BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com said:
>
> > Yes, I'm a nutter...who isn't? I mean, you're supposedly a person
> > composed of ASCII characters, we're to believe...does the phrase
> > "fine one to talk" spring to mind anywhere, nutter? ;)
> >
> > Beth :)
> _____
> Let's see...what's the female ((( `\
> equivalent of 'wanker?' _ _`\ )
According to the English comedienne Jo Brand, it's "gusset typist".
HTH,
Phil
-- They no longer do my traditional winks tournament lunch - liver and bacon. It's just what you need during a winks tournament lunchtime to replace lost ... liver. -- Anthony Horton, 2004/08/27 at the Cambridge 'Long Vac.'
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: Any Danger With The "Buffer Overflow Exploits" by using Assembler Language ?"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- In reply to: Annie: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Next in thread: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: [OT] Why Bush?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
