Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)
From: Randall Hyde (randyhyde_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 11/15/04
- Previous message: hutch--: "Re: Is MASM32 an evil Microsoft plot?"
- Maybe in reply to: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Next in thread: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Reply: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Reply: NoDot: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:03:49 GMT
NoDot,
I'm sure you understand that I perfectly agree with "C" that debating with
"The_Stooge" is a complete waste of time.
The bottom line is that he's repeating old arguments that have been shown
to be false in the past. Once you get tired of his arguments, he'll wait a
few months and trap another sucker into the exchange. That's how he
gets his jollies, apparently. Best advice - add him to your kill file and
respond *only* to those who interact with him -- just to correct any
misconceptions they might garner.
And, btw, the guy knows *nothing* about OOP, just like he knows
nothing about the C programming language. That ought to be fairly
obvious to you by now.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
- Previous message: hutch--: "Re: Is MASM32 an evil Microsoft plot?"
- Maybe in reply to: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Next in thread: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Reply: The_Sage: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Reply: NoDot: "Re: On assembly and portability (between Linux and Windows)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|