Re: You want MASM? You got it.
From: Annie (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Previous message: Herbert Kleebauer: "Re: Mouse?!"
- Next in thread: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: The/|\\Wannabee([+]): "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: Betov: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: f0dder: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: Randall Hyde: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Nov 2004 02:16:52 +0400
On 2004-11-19 Ray Ransom said:
> After days of research and experimentation, I have come up with a
> Windoze source file template that can be assembled by both TASM and
> MASM. My first such example is attached below. It has no includes,
> no language specifier, no PROTOs, no PROCs, no stack frames and no
> high-level constructs.
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
>
> - This programming example is posted as A way to do standard
> Windoze GUI stuff. There is no implication or claim that it is the
> best, only, smallest or fastest way. Any comments presupposing
> this will be ignored.
>
> - Any disparaging comments about coding style, as opposed to
> content, or references to "old DOS junk" will be ignored.
>
> - Any allegations that this program violates accepted practice or
> takes dangerous shortcuts, without supporting proof, will be
> ignored.
> _____
> [ ... ] ((( `\
_ _`\ )
YEAH! Way to go, Ray...take (^ ) )
no prisoners. Hehe! ~-( )
_'((,,,)))
I'd be willing to try your ,-' \_/ `\
code, except that I don't ( , |
own Bill Gates' pointee- `-.-'`-.-'/|_|
clickee abomination. \ / | |
=()=: / ,' aa
But for this, I'm almost tempted
to snag an illicit copy from a
WaReZ site. Hehehe!
- Next message: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Previous message: Herbert Kleebauer: "Re: Mouse?!"
- Next in thread: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: The/|\\Wannabee([+]): "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: Betov: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Reply: wolfgang kern: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: f0dder: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: Randall Hyde: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: arargh411NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Maybe reply: hutch--: "Re: You want MASM? You got it."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]