Re: A comparison of HLA to VC++...

From: SevagK (kahlinor_at_nop.yahoo.com)
Date: 11/29/04 

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:35:13 -0500

by The_Sage <specialoffers@CityBend.com> Nov 28, 2004 at 09:13 PM

>They mean everything to me but obviously your reply means >you have
>absolutely
>none. Thank you for proving to us beyond a shadow of a >doubt that when
you
>said,
>"It's a simple exercise of probability", you really meant, >"It's a
simple
>exercise of pretending".

Egad! I'm arguing with a mental midget.

You keep proving to everyone that you don't know what you're talking
about.

>Wrong again. I had some experience with HLA but unlike you, >I learned
from
>my
>experience then wised up and went on to something I felt >was bigger and
>better...like the HLA called VC++ for example.

Just proves my point. As I said, it won't work for everyone and it
doesn't have to. If it works for one person, your argument is dead in the
water. HLA has worked and is working for many.

You want data? I know it's a bit hard for you but try to follow this
logic.
  If it didn't work, AoA sales would have gone down, Randall Hyde would
have lost credibility and nobody would come to him for more book deals.
Further, nobody would bother visiting the hla home site.

As it turns out, none of this happend and you are out of data. Sure,
there are some who are jealous, nay even envious of this success and will
lash out unreasonably no matter how much it damages their reputation.

Boo hoo.

>Obviously you are delusional.

You should learn to expand your mind. And I don't mean by using drugs.

Again try to follow, I'll keep this short and simple for you.

Assume a probability of an event happening is 0 .. 1, where 0 is a logical
impossability and 1 describes events that have already occured, 100%
certainty.

Your birth event is a probability of 1. Against all the odds, conditions
of this unit of gravity we call a "universe" were just right to allow it.

Think bigger...the birth of the universe. Probability of 1. This means a
probability of infinite "universes" is a logical certainty. In infinity,
there will no doubt be another unit of gravity with exactly the same
conditions to allow you to be born (and die) again.

-kain

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why the cards must have a memory
    ... ***it assumes that the probability is heads half the time FROM NOW ... But the assumption of infinite instances is, ... As presently understood, the universe ... natural laws and logical principles. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Why the cards must have a memory
    ... ***it assumes that the probability is heads half the time FROM NOW ... But the assumption of infinite instances is, ... of our known universe, false. ... natural laws and logical principles. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Why the cards must have a memory
    ... ***it assumes that the probability is heads half the time FROM NOW ... incident in this case being a coin toss). ... But the assumption of infinite instances is, ... As presently understood, the universe ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: WHY the cards have a memory
    ... ***it assumes that the probability is heads half the time FROM NOW ... But the assumption of infinite instances is, ... As presently understood, the universe ... natural laws and logical principles. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Why the cards must have a memory
    ... ***it assumes that the probability is heads half the time FROM NOW ... But the assumption of infinite instances is, ... As presently understood, the universe ... natural laws and logical principles. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)