Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments
From: wolfgang kern (nowhere_at_nevernet.at)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: wolfgang kern: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: [ Attn: Randy ] Ad-hoc Parsing?"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Next in thread: T.M. Sommers: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:18:06 +0100
Beth replied:
[..] thanks for the explanation
| Of course, if you want to do "direct" things then DOS-like stuff (or "roll
| your own" OSes :) would be better, even if only from the perspective that
| you need to do anything before you can do "direct access"...but Linux isn't
| quite as bad as Windows...please wash your mouth out with soap and water
| for saying so! ;)
OK. I'll 'furtherhin' rank Linux above windoze, even this wont weigh much
if I compare the two to KESYS. :)
__
wolfgang
- Next message: wolfgang kern: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: [ Attn: Randy ] Ad-hoc Parsing?"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Next in thread: T.M. Sommers: "Re: A snapshot of the LuxAsm developments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]