Re: Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)
From: Phil Carmody (thefatphil_demunged_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Evenbit: "Re: wanna do something nerdy and cool?"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: wanna do something nerdy and cool?"
- Maybe in reply to: marcus: "Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 05 Jan 2005 01:56:10 +0200
"Beth" <BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com> writes:
> Oh, yeah, I'm not saying X is perfect...but compared to Windows' insanely
> wasteful and pointless (and illogical) design, X is an "angel" of GUI
> design...
Tha absurd thing is that someone in the past once said:
"Programming X-Windows is like trying to find the square
root of pi using roman numerals. "
When _that_ has suddenly become the more elegant system, then something
somewhere else has gone horribly, horribly wrong. (I quite like Xlib
to be honest, it's trivial to write a C++ wrapper around it that is
wonderfully easy and natural to use. Not particularly useful for real
world programs but fine for simple monitors (e.g. xload) or graphics
demos.)
Phil
-- The gun is good. The penis is evil... Go forth and kill.
- Next message: Evenbit: "Re: wanna do something nerdy and cool?"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: wanna do something nerdy and cool?"
- Maybe in reply to: marcus: "Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Next in thread: Beth: "Re: Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Anybody here endure C/Cpp? (.h to .inc conversion)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]