Re: this is the time to pray

From: Percival (dragontamer5788_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/17/05 

Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:41:15 -0500

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:05:52 +0000, Betov wrote:

> Percival <dragontamer5788@yahoo.com> écrivait
> news:pan.2005.01.16.21.12.13.198062@yahoo.com:
>
>> I tell you now, if you stop these posts, I'll stop responding to you.
>
> Sure, Percival. The Israelian attitude toward
> the palestinian: "Stop agressing us, and we will
> stop aggressing you". But, mind you the is there
> an agressor (Israel) and an agressee (the palestinians),
> as well as here, as long as we have had to suffer
> your religious bullshits agressions for _centuries_.
>
> So, _YOU_ stop posting your bullshits, and i'll stop
> answering to them to defend sanity.

Then comes the case where agressees respond more harshly to the agressors.
If I punch you once, and you punch me twice, what logic reasoning is that?
I punch you one more time to get even (2 punches to 2 punches) yet the
agressee wants to be on the upper side when he finishes. Both sides do.

The question is, who started it all?

Did I start it, or did you start it?

Of course, Ro started this thread, but now he really isn't responding much.

Then, you responded to Ro, whereas if you really didn't care about
religion, you wouldn't have done it at all.

Of course, I care, so I responded.

Now, because the starter is no longer here, does that make me the one who
"started it?" In essence, you betov struck before me, and I responded. I
would not have started it at all if you never responded to Ro.

Or, is it I who started it? As I share the views similar to Ro. However,
it should be taken into account that I am a different person from Ro,
unique in my own ways. Again, I would have never started this, nor would
have you Betov. And now that the starter is gone, neither one of us has
started it.

So the case is exactly like palistines vs Isreal. Time has passed too
long, and the original people who started the war are no longer in power.
Yet it is human instinct to continue warfare, and both sides keep blaming
each other.

The fact of the matter is, both sides are equally selfish and equally
wrong. This argument tends to go to who struck first, but it is now
irrelevant. Honestly, someone who claims to be superior because of his
lack of faith should at least see this by now.

Percival