Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time?

From: NoDot (no_dot_at_msn.remove_this.com)
Date: 01/22/05 

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:52:44 -0500

Herbert Kleebauer wrote:
> [I don't understand
> why she now says, that this has nothing to do with a return
> from HLL to assembler).

Answer: because it *doesn't*! 

-- 
The above was written by NoDot.
Visit the Website of NoDot:
<www.geocities.com/nodot1989/>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The best Assembler.
    ... Herbert Kleebauer écrivait news:408685C3.AFEF8228 ... of your Erde Demo C version, to RosAsm. ... When HLLs provide Inline Assembly, ... featuring an Assembler with Click&Go Components Builders, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: The best Assembler.
    ... Herbert Kleebauer écrivait ... > in assembler if better assembler tools are available. ... > as fast as the HLL programmer, ... > if more hobby programmers would use an assembler, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Question about jumps
    ... Herbert Kleebauer écrivait ... (you can anything in assembler). ... really need the assembler code or can it also be done in a ... using an HLL as long as any actual Assembler can do the same? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Arrrrrrrrrrrrggggg!!
    ... Herbert Kleebauer écrivait news:42283806.72397053 ... > why you should implement an assembler in assembler and not in ... > a HLL. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: How many here think we should close down alt.lang.asm?
    ... Just play more attention, on NoDot words. ... I mean, if he actually learned that kinda thought or behaviour, from ... certain assembler, and self promotiong his self on the cost of other ... their interests are from the good of the community? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)