Re: this is the time to pray

From: The /\\\\o//\\annabee (faq_at_.@.@(0_FFFF_FFFF)szmyggenpv.com)
Date: 02/02/05 

Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:33:07 +0100

På Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:28:04 GMT, skrev Beth
<BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com>:

BethStoned said :>
xamples which logically defy "natural selection"
too...as I say, I'd need to look up the exact details but, off the top of
my memory, there's some bird or something that has two stomachs...and one
stomach is the usual "digestive" kind...while the other one simply contains
a toxin...now, it is observed that animals _avoid_ eating this bird thing
because it has this "toxin" in its second stomach...but the question is how
could this state of affairs "evolve" by "natural selection" _ALONE_? It
would bizarrely _require_ that the bird is eaten for this to "evolve" as a
"defence" and for the other animals to _die_ in order to "evolve" the sense
not to eat it...but if they die, then how do they "evolve" this?

Beth, this is easy to explain. Painfully easy. Theres no paradox at all.
First the stumack has evolved by ways of mutation. Some of the animals
have evolved a lust for this other bird, they die, some get sick, and some
dont even eat it. Some dont want to eat it, and some observe others dying.
Animals can learn things too you know. The fact that animals can learn new
stuff from observation is painfully obvious, and proven also by
scientist-people observing animals. 

-- 
http://www.TheWannabee.org