Re: Betov's crappy notation

From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 02/17/05 

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 01:38:31 GMT

Rene wrote:
> Beth wrote:
> > Note, I agree that Rene's syntax is highly dubious in claiming "Intel
> > syntax" or "NASM syntax"...I too fail to see the syntactical or
> > semantical similiarities at all there...
>
> Entirely on your fault. Not on mine

Probably; I wasn't saying that it was your fault, Rene...I just said that I
failed to see it myself...

Beth :)

Quantcast