Re: A status rapport from LuxAsm list

From: Beth (BethStone21_at_hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com)
Date: 02/25/05 

Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:10:31 GMT

'\\o//'annabee wrote:
> NoDot wrote:
> > '\\o//'annabee wrote:
> >> 3. Re: More "unification" and LuxAsm syntax (Beth)
> >
> > Anyone who cares to notice will see that this was already sent to the
> > group.
>
> It got sent to the group at a much later time here. When I could not see
> it for several hours, I posted it anyhow. Should have known better that
to
> think it wouldnt be posted here anyhow. And should have read the whole
> thing first as well.

Don't forget how USENET itself works...the posts are "propogated" from one
news server to another...this _CAN_ take some time, depending on the routes
the "propogations" follow and how frequently a "server" passes things on
and all that kind of nonsense :)...

Although, again, _WHY_ are you randomly grabbing things off the LuxAsm
mailing-list - even confessing you ain't even bothered to read what it
says - and then reposting it here all the time? Especially when it's all
"public" and we happily _welcome_ subscribers to the list so, if someone
really wants to "lurk" - as you appear a "pig in mud" doing there - then
just ask and it can be sent _direct_ to your "inbox" with our full
compliments, for pity's sake!!

Any particular reason? Because, normally, when someone is doing this kind
of "gossiping" nonsense, it tends to be for the sole purposes of things
like, ooh, what's known in the vernacular as "sh*t stirring" and "FUD
spreading" and so forth...

Beth :)

Loading