Re: HAY HERBERT, yet another win89ddk
From: hutch-- (hutch_at_movsd.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: '\\\\o//'annabee: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: A status rapport from LuxAsm list"
- In reply to: '\\\\o//'annabee: "Re: HAY HERBERT, yet another win89ddk"
- Next in thread: Sevag Krikorian: "Re: HAY HERBERT, yet another win89ddk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 18:54:43 -0800
Frank,
Now I am getting the same error message, it probably means they are
doing some chages on the server or perhaps the server is playing up.
Still, it easily proved the point that much of the bullsh*t floating
around here was wrong. If they change the link, we will have to see
where it pops up next.
Now to FEARLESS LEADER or further comments from the peanut gallery.
============================================
Both solutions are perfect to me, and the only way you
could go, to save you from being either a pirate, or a
sub-*** idiot, would be to ask MicroSoft to _pay_ you
officially to fight, against Assembly, and against the
Open Sources Mouvement. That way, you would only be a
sub-***. (The best you can do).
============================================
I have made it back to the big time almost, I have again reached the
elevated status of being a "sub ***" which is nearly as exhalted as
being the "fucky one".
> Both solutions are perfect to me
Who gives a stuff what FEARLESS LEADER thinks here, its not like it
mater to anyone else except the great man himself.
> to fight, against Assembly, and against the Open Sources Mouvement.
For the MAN who is cobbling together a pseudo compiler that is trying
to ape a assembler for the Windows Platform, this is pure fantasy. When
FEARLESS LEADER writes a working assembler for LINUX under GPL. not the
BLS (Betov Licencing System), then he may have some credibility but at
the moment with FEARLESS LEADER writing a WINDOWS SPECIFIC assembler to
support Bill, Steve and all the boys and girls at Microsoft, his
credibility is ZERO.ZERO.
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
- Next message: '\\\\o//'annabee: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Previous message: Beth: "Re: A status rapport from LuxAsm list"
- In reply to: '\\\\o//'annabee: "Re: HAY HERBERT, yet another win89ddk"
- Next in thread: Sevag Krikorian: "Re: HAY HERBERT, yet another win89ddk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]